16:0216:02, 16 February 2014diffhist−2
Toy Story 3
Bad to claim in caption that scene was highly rated for it's effects when the Reception section makes no mention of this whatsoever. Readd authorlink that was removed without explanation. Fix Woody, capital W
14:5814:58, 16 February 2014diffhist−56
Toy Story 3
Fix malformed citation. The image caption should not make claims not already in the article. Reception section does not mention the incinerator scene received particular praise for effects.
14:4814:48, 16 February 2014diffhist−7
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
It is an overview, "positive" is fine. The previous wording was "critical acclaim". "mostly positive" is wrong and actually downvalues the very positive reviews it received. Undid revision 595528336 by
Flyer22
16:0216:02, 16 February 2014diffhist−2
Toy Story 3
Bad to claim in caption that scene was highly rated for it's effects when the Reception section makes no mention of this whatsoever. Readd authorlink that was removed without explanation. Fix Woody, capital W
14:5814:58, 16 February 2014diffhist−56
Toy Story 3
Fix malformed citation. The image caption should not make claims not already in the article. Reception section does not mention the incinerator scene received particular praise for effects.
14:4814:48, 16 February 2014diffhist−7
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
It is an overview, "positive" is fine. The previous wording was "critical acclaim". "mostly positive" is wrong and actually downvalues the very positive reviews it received. Undid revision 595528336 by
Flyer22