01:1601:16, 28 March 2018diffhist−5
Jessie Ace and Margaret Wright
→Recognition: notoriety -> fame. As Wiktionary puts it, "Notorious is often misused for well-known, famous, or celebrated; however, in Modern English, its meaning has changed. Notorious is not a positive attribute."
18:3418:34, 15 March 2018diffhist−137
Brent and Harrow (London Assembly constituency)
Undid revision 830414483 by
Siddiqsazzad001 (
talk) - no explanation given for restoring text deleted with full explanation, i.e. "
WP:OR of dubious value and even methodology, unsourced and not included in other Wikipedia constituency articles or general or academic literature or reporting, for good reasons esp considering the rapid changes in population". Please discuss before reinserting this material.Tags: Undosection blanking
14 March 2018
17:4517:45, 14 March 2018diffhist−137
Brent and Harrow (London Assembly constituency)
WP:OR of dubious value and even methodology, unsourced and not included in other Wikipedia constituency articles or general or academic literature or reporting, for good reasons esp considering the rapid changes in populationTag: section blanking
01:1601:16, 28 March 2018diffhist−5
Jessie Ace and Margaret Wright
→Recognition: notoriety -> fame. As Wiktionary puts it, "Notorious is often misused for well-known, famous, or celebrated; however, in Modern English, its meaning has changed. Notorious is not a positive attribute."
18:3418:34, 15 March 2018diffhist−137
Brent and Harrow (London Assembly constituency)
Undid revision 830414483 by
Siddiqsazzad001 (
talk) - no explanation given for restoring text deleted with full explanation, i.e. "
WP:OR of dubious value and even methodology, unsourced and not included in other Wikipedia constituency articles or general or academic literature or reporting, for good reasons esp considering the rapid changes in population". Please discuss before reinserting this material.Tags: Undosection blanking
14 March 2018
17:4517:45, 14 March 2018diffhist−137
Brent and Harrow (London Assembly constituency)
WP:OR of dubious value and even methodology, unsourced and not included in other Wikipedia constituency articles or general or academic literature or reporting, for good reasons esp considering the rapid changes in populationTag: section blanking