22:5322:53, 11 October 2012diffhist+8,438
RAND Corporation
Revert. Throwing away the baby with the bathing water again. Many of these people are notable *because* of their association with RAND or it forms an important part of their careers.
22:5022:50, 11 October 2012diffhist−171
Scientific Linux
In this way, this statement makes even less sense, and again no source is given. Non-essential, unsourced and speculative -> deleted
18:0118:01, 5 August 2012diffhist+6,067
RAND Corporation
No, most of it *is* cited, in any cate if you're willing to click through to the articles. I'm putting a lot of time into this, and I will not have this undone by someone who obviously is not putting more than half a minute into this.
13:3113:31, 5 August 2012diffhist+7,587
RAND Corporation
So, we remove Von Neumann from the list due to a lack of sourcing? There's a limit to how much ignorance is excusable
14:0314:03, 5 May 2012diffhist−34
KT (energy)
All that's in here will be nicely covered by Atkins, I think. Feel free to come up with more specific requests for sources if you can't find it in there
13:3113:31, 30 April 2012diffhist−51
Formate
Removed {{Unreferenced stub}}: article consists of sourced statements and completely obvious stuff (consult an organic chemistry textbook of your choice)
22:5322:53, 11 October 2012diffhist+8,438
RAND Corporation
Revert. Throwing away the baby with the bathing water again. Many of these people are notable *because* of their association with RAND or it forms an important part of their careers.
22:5022:50, 11 October 2012diffhist−171
Scientific Linux
In this way, this statement makes even less sense, and again no source is given. Non-essential, unsourced and speculative -> deleted
18:0118:01, 5 August 2012diffhist+6,067
RAND Corporation
No, most of it *is* cited, in any cate if you're willing to click through to the articles. I'm putting a lot of time into this, and I will not have this undone by someone who obviously is not putting more than half a minute into this.
13:3113:31, 5 August 2012diffhist+7,587
RAND Corporation
So, we remove Von Neumann from the list due to a lack of sourcing? There's a limit to how much ignorance is excusable
14:0314:03, 5 May 2012diffhist−34
KT (energy)
All that's in here will be nicely covered by Atkins, I think. Feel free to come up with more specific requests for sources if you can't find it in there
13:3113:31, 30 April 2012diffhist−51
Formate
Removed {{Unreferenced stub}}: article consists of sourced statements and completely obvious stuff (consult an organic chemistry textbook of your choice)