20:3520:35, 14 February 2015diffhist+226
Dreadnoughtus
Christina1969 wrote that: "Ok, then I'm going to add the more precise estimates back, based on Lacovara et al, but with round up (56.3 tonnes instead of 56,255 kg, ect...)", and she is right, three digit is not unduly precise, and Lacovara et al is newer.
18:1218:12, 26 January 2015diffhist0
Dreadnoughtus
FunkMonk and IJReid, who are among the best contributors on wikipedia said that: FunkMonk: "But Wikipedia articles are not supposed to interpret the sources,only reflect what they say." IJReid: "if the paper has found that precise of an estimate, it can s
20:3520:35, 14 February 2015diffhist+226
Dreadnoughtus
Christina1969 wrote that: "Ok, then I'm going to add the more precise estimates back, based on Lacovara et al, but with round up (56.3 tonnes instead of 56,255 kg, ect...)", and she is right, three digit is not unduly precise, and Lacovara et al is newer.
18:1218:12, 26 January 2015diffhist0
Dreadnoughtus
FunkMonk and IJReid, who are among the best contributors on wikipedia said that: FunkMonk: "But Wikipedia articles are not supposed to interpret the sources,only reflect what they say." IJReid: "if the paper has found that precise of an estimate, it can s