18:3118:31, 9 July 2010diffhist−730
Talk:Skanderbeg
so...its up to complete outsiders with no knowledge of the subject or the dispute to decide?? how am i an 'involved party' anyway...i didnt take part in the dispute..im removing it altogether then...
14:4714:47, 9 July 2010diffhist+2
Perëndi
it COULD be 'illyrothracian' (not that valid a grouping..) if the last connection is correct but not if the others are
02:0302:03, 9 July 2010diffhist−1
Perëndi
but all etymologies cant be right at the same time..its an interesting article so please source it better if you could
01:5901:59, 9 July 2010diffhist+23
Perëndi
it seems like a pagan god subsumed by the christian god after christianization and becoming a simple name for him but also surviving in folklore with certain 'pagan' properties..
18:3118:31, 9 July 2010diffhist−730
Talk:Skanderbeg
so...its up to complete outsiders with no knowledge of the subject or the dispute to decide?? how am i an 'involved party' anyway...i didnt take part in the dispute..im removing it altogether then...
14:4714:47, 9 July 2010diffhist+2
Perëndi
it COULD be 'illyrothracian' (not that valid a grouping..) if the last connection is correct but not if the others are
02:0302:03, 9 July 2010diffhist−1
Perëndi
but all etymologies cant be right at the same time..its an interesting article so please source it better if you could
01:5901:59, 9 July 2010diffhist+23
Perëndi
it seems like a pagan god subsumed by the christian god after christianization and becoming a simple name for him but also surviving in folklore with certain 'pagan' properties..