13:0713:07, 19 May 2008diffhist−6,291
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
what is going on here? you are reverting back in BLP vios and original research - being a fan of doctor who doesn't override policy.
12:5612:56, 19 May 2008diffhist−6,291
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
actually try READING what you are reverting - including an insinutation that the producer was making decisions because he was a homosexual... don't just revert, please provide objections to removal.
11:4911:49, 19 May 2008diffhist−284
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
→Age: this is more Original research - we just report the facts, we don't speculate on things that are a) never mentioned and b) require us to make guesses about the biology of characters.
11:4411:44, 19 May 2008diffhist−734
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
→Age: this is original research as well - we don't a) guess or b) speculate - we just provide a summary of what reliable sources have said - if they haven't said it - neither do we.
11:4311:43, 19 May 2008diffhist−370
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
→Age: all we say is that it's uncertain, we don't speculate on the "possiblities" we just report on the speculation made by reliable third-party sources. this is basic stuff.
11:4211:42, 19 May 2008diffhist−6,291
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
instead of just reverting me in a lazy kneejerk fashion, would someone like to explain on the talkpage how this section isn't a) original research and b) unsourced and unverfied?
11:3111:31, 19 May 2008diffhist−6,291
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
nothing at all "helpful" about my edit Alex, so please don't just bang out templates to people, this is all original research, this should only be included if it can be SOURCED - this is basic policy
13:0713:07, 19 May 2008diffhist−6,291
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
what is going on here? you are reverting back in BLP vios and original research - being a fan of doctor who doesn't override policy.
12:5612:56, 19 May 2008diffhist−6,291
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
actually try READING what you are reverting - including an insinutation that the producer was making decisions because he was a homosexual... don't just revert, please provide objections to removal.
11:4911:49, 19 May 2008diffhist−284
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
→Age: this is more Original research - we just report the facts, we don't speculate on things that are a) never mentioned and b) require us to make guesses about the biology of characters.
11:4411:44, 19 May 2008diffhist−734
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
→Age: this is original research as well - we don't a) guess or b) speculate - we just provide a summary of what reliable sources have said - if they haven't said it - neither do we.
11:4311:43, 19 May 2008diffhist−370
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
→Age: all we say is that it's uncertain, we don't speculate on the "possiblities" we just report on the speculation made by reliable third-party sources. this is basic stuff.
11:4211:42, 19 May 2008diffhist−6,291
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
instead of just reverting me in a lazy kneejerk fashion, would someone like to explain on the talkpage how this section isn't a) original research and b) unsourced and unverfied?
11:3111:31, 19 May 2008diffhist−6,291
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
nothing at all "helpful" about my edit Alex, so please don't just bang out templates to people, this is all original research, this should only be included if it can be SOURCED - this is basic policy