For 86.181.0.242 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

2 April 2021

30 March 2021

28 March 2021

27 March 2021

  • 18:05 18:05, 27 March 2021 diff hist −290 Rear-projection televisionUndid revision 1013159957 by Pancho507 ( talk) A 1964 publication is not a good reference for 1936 technology. The limitation really was the fact that the glass blowing capability could not produce shorter tubes for the screen size. The deflection technology was very different but quite capable of deflecting short tubes had they existed. Tags: Undo references removed
For 86.181.0.242 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

2 April 2021

30 March 2021

28 March 2021

27 March 2021

  • 18:05 18:05, 27 March 2021 diff hist −290 Rear-projection televisionUndid revision 1013159957 by Pancho507 ( talk) A 1964 publication is not a good reference for 1936 technology. The limitation really was the fact that the glass blowing capability could not produce shorter tubes for the screen size. The deflection technology was very different but quite capable of deflecting short tubes had they existed. Tags: Undo references removed

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook