15:4015:40, 25 March 2018diffhist+105
Scholz's Star
→Solar System flyby: Perhaps not all that relevant, but according to the source quoted here, in the article, Scholz's star was brighest viewed from about 64 degrees north ±30 degrees and at a right ascension of around 200 degrees ±14 degrees, i.e. the autumn season. This is of course why there are so many images online of a Neanderthal, or a Denosivan, viewing the star flaring. Modern humans in North Africa/Middle East/South Asia, at the time, would've barely noticed it at all flaring, and then only very low in the sky on the horizon to the north.
00:1000:10, 22 March 2018diffhist−1
South American lungfish
"Fish's" rather than "fishes" because this article is specifically about just one species of lungfish, rather than multiple species of lungfish. The source for the sentence is a book reference so I can't check whether it was meant to be specific in reference that one species but if it isn't then it should've said so in the sentence.
15:4015:40, 25 March 2018diffhist+105
Scholz's Star
→Solar System flyby: Perhaps not all that relevant, but according to the source quoted here, in the article, Scholz's star was brighest viewed from about 64 degrees north ±30 degrees and at a right ascension of around 200 degrees ±14 degrees, i.e. the autumn season. This is of course why there are so many images online of a Neanderthal, or a Denosivan, viewing the star flaring. Modern humans in North Africa/Middle East/South Asia, at the time, would've barely noticed it at all flaring, and then only very low in the sky on the horizon to the north.
00:1000:10, 22 March 2018diffhist−1
South American lungfish
"Fish's" rather than "fishes" because this article is specifically about just one species of lungfish, rather than multiple species of lungfish. The source for the sentence is a book reference so I can't check whether it was meant to be specific in reference that one species but if it isn't then it should've said so in the sentence.