07:4407:44, 23 December 2011diffhist−2,047
Qizilbash
the safavids werent ghulat and shah ismail wasnt alevi prove he was alevi and the safavids were ghulat from shia source or any non sunni source
07:4107:41, 23 December 2011diffhist−189
Ismail I
he wrote sufi poems? wheres the source? and he didnt believe in his divinity give me a non ANTI SAFAVID sunni source that proves that
07:3607:36, 23 December 2011diffhist−12
Ismail I
abul muzaffar bin haydar al safavi? why are you saying his name arabic style and he didnt even have a son called muzaffar
07:3407:34, 23 December 2011diffhist−20
Shaykh Junayd
the safavids werent ghulat and shah ismail wasnt alevi prove he was alevi and the safavids were ghulat from shia source or any non sunni source
07:3107:31, 23 December 2011diffhist−409
Safavid dynasty
the safavids werent ghulat and shah ismail wasnt alevi prove he was alevi and the safavids were ghulat from shia source or any non sunni source
07:4407:44, 23 December 2011diffhist−2,047
Qizilbash
the safavids werent ghulat and shah ismail wasnt alevi prove he was alevi and the safavids were ghulat from shia source or any non sunni source
07:4107:41, 23 December 2011diffhist−189
Ismail I
he wrote sufi poems? wheres the source? and he didnt believe in his divinity give me a non ANTI SAFAVID sunni source that proves that
07:3607:36, 23 December 2011diffhist−12
Ismail I
abul muzaffar bin haydar al safavi? why are you saying his name arabic style and he didnt even have a son called muzaffar
07:3407:34, 23 December 2011diffhist−20
Shaykh Junayd
the safavids werent ghulat and shah ismail wasnt alevi prove he was alevi and the safavids were ghulat from shia source or any non sunni source
07:3107:31, 23 December 2011diffhist−409
Safavid dynasty
the safavids werent ghulat and shah ismail wasnt alevi prove he was alevi and the safavids were ghulat from shia source or any non sunni source