For 84.13.156.208
talk
block log
logs
filter log
10 August 2007
- 02:19 02:19, 10 August 2007 diff hist +255 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Tyrenius: an "attempted suicide"? You guys just don't learn - you need to do some checking-up on exactly who you appoint as admins.
- 02:14 02:14, 10 August 2007 diff hist +302 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Tyrenius: you need to do some checking-up on exactly who you appoint as admins
- 02:09 02:09, 10 August 2007 diff hist +10 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Vintagekits & MrDarcy: need to have different section headings
- 01:56 01:56, 10 August 2007 diff hist +569 User talk:84.13.156.208 Vkit's Parole Officer? slandering Vintagekits left and right, and yet Vintagekits is the one blocked? I'll say it again, absolutely disgraceful block. SirFozzie 07:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- 01:50 01:50, 10 August 2007 diff hist −16 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Insurgent sympathiser: Tyrenius: Jeez!
- 01:49 01:49, 10 August 2007 diff hist +1,047 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Insurgent sympathiser: Tyrenius: Vk didn't directly call anyone a liar
- 01:37 01:37, 10 August 2007 diff hist +155 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Insurgent sympathiser: Tyrenius: The insurgents have their own pet admin.
- 01:35 01:35, 10 August 2007 diff hist +463 User talk:84.13.156.208 Insurgent sympathiser: Tyrenius
- 01:25 01:25, 10 August 2007 diff hist +701 User talk:84.13.156.208 →MrDarcy: I asked the simple question: why no Arbcom? (My conclusion was that everybody was too scared of the team of insurgent sympathisers to do anything about their consistently biassed edi
- 01:14 01:14, 10 August 2007 diff hist +249 User talk:Vintagekits and who are you to say whether my comment is wanted or unwanted - another team editor? There must be loads of you team players lurking!
- 00:58 00:58, 10 August 2007 diff hist +1,076 User talk:84.13.156.208 He's got multiple socks is very uncivil and revert wars constantly. And yet nobody dares take him to an arbcom because they gnow the rest of the team will gang up on them
- 00:43 00:43, 10 August 2007 diff hist +249 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?: restoring comments censored by Vintagekits is in his own cause. I thought he could chop the section but not distort the loop?
- 00:35 00:35, 10 August 2007 diff hist +36 User talk:Vintagekits →Response to deleted messages 2: add sig
- 00:33 00:33, 10 August 2007 diff hist +36 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?: add sig
- 00:27 00:27, 10 August 2007 diff hist +621 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Vintagekits: it seems kinda freaky that these insurgent sympathisers can spread their hate and twist the truth
9 August 2007
- 23:14 23:14, 9 August 2007 diff hist +330 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions: == User_talk:Vintagekits history restored == Thanks for restoring the history, Rockpocket
- 23:09 23:09, 9 August 2007 diff hist +332 User talk:Vintagekits adding sig
- 22:49 22:49, 9 August 2007 diff hist +200 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Vintagekits: why are these insurgents allowed to get away with all this?
- 22:43 22:43, 9 August 2007 diff hist +430 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Vintagekits: that text in italics above wasn't there when I posted before. You can't see it now because you have airbrushed out the history of the edits on Vintagekiits user talk page
- 22:36 22:36, 9 August 2007 diff hist +1,389 User talk:84.13.156.208 it seems you are determined to protect these terrorists - I find I can't edit on your page
- 22:23 22:23, 9 August 2007 diff hist +63 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions: sig
- 22:22 22:22, 9 August 2007 diff hist +272 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions: Why have you now even censored the whole history of several weeks of contributions on Vintagekits talk page?
- 22:21 22:21, 9 August 2007 diff hist +286 User talk:84.13.156.208 As I made very clear earlier, I am not a new editor.
- 22:18 22:18, 9 August 2007 diff hist +79 User talk:84.13.156.208 I'm very sorry. I did not realise Vkits had been jailed. I will stop at once.
- 22:16 22:16, 9 August 2007 diff hist +353 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Vintagekits: Surely our First Amendment rights count for something even when we are posted overseas?
- 22:05 22:05, 9 August 2007 diff hist +379 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions: Why have you now even censored the whole history of several weeks of contributions on Vintagekits talk page?
- 22:01 22:01, 9 August 2007 diff hist +110 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions
- 21:54 21:54, 9 August 2007 diff hist +68 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions: == Vintagekits == Why is it edit warring by me to ask civil and pertinent questions?
- 21:52 21:52, 9 August 2007 diff hist +1,567 User talk:84.13.156.208 Why does he not wish to communicate with me?
- 21:43 21:43, 9 August 2007 diff hist +397 User talk:Vintagekits Why do you not wish me to communicate with you?
- 21:40 21:40, 9 August 2007 diff hist +397 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?: Why do you not wish me to communicate with you? Aplogies to other editors who's comments were deleted by mass reversion by Vintagekits
- 21:33 21:33, 9 August 2007 diff hist +49 User talk:Vintagekits Why do you not wish me to communicate with you?
- 21:32 21:32, 9 August 2007 diff hist −1 M62 coach bombing No edit summary
- 21:29 21:29, 9 August 2007 diff hist +397 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?
- 21:20 21:20, 9 August 2007 diff hist +219 User talk:Vintagekits I certainly think Vintagekits should be left alone to make useful contributions - but it's not a good sign that his first contribution to a co-operative project is to censor other editors and allege s
- 21:12 21:12, 9 August 2007 diff hist +2,753 User talk:Vintagekits →Welcome back
- 21:07 21:07, 9 August 2007 diff hist +56 User talk:Vintagekits →Response to deleted messages
- 21:03 21:03, 9 August 2007 diff hist +3,620 User talk:Vintagekits →Response to deleted messages
- 20:39 20:39, 9 August 2007 diff hist +476 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?
- 20:31 20:31, 9 August 2007 diff hist +283 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?
- 20:20 20:20, 9 August 2007 diff hist +843 User talk:Vintagekits restoring 2 editors comments removed by blocked user in violation of his parole and promises to exhibit improved behaviour
- 20:11 20:11, 9 August 2007 diff hist +33 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?
- 20:06 20:06, 9 August 2007 diff hist +576 User talk:Vintagekits revert user on parole
- 19:52 19:52, 9 August 2007 diff hist +576 User talk:Vintagekits →[[Jamie Moore (boxer)|Jamie Moore]]
- 19:33 19:33, 9 August 2007 diff hist +2 John May (judge) copyedit. Isn't Wikipedia wonderful?
- 19:27 19:27, 9 August 2007 diff hist −1 M62 coach bombing No edit summary
 | This is the
contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
For 84.13.156.208
talk
block log
logs
filter log
10 August 2007
- 02:19 02:19, 10 August 2007 diff hist +255 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Tyrenius: an "attempted suicide"? You guys just don't learn - you need to do some checking-up on exactly who you appoint as admins.
- 02:14 02:14, 10 August 2007 diff hist +302 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Tyrenius: you need to do some checking-up on exactly who you appoint as admins
- 02:09 02:09, 10 August 2007 diff hist +10 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Vintagekits & MrDarcy: need to have different section headings
- 01:56 01:56, 10 August 2007 diff hist +569 User talk:84.13.156.208 Vkit's Parole Officer? slandering Vintagekits left and right, and yet Vintagekits is the one blocked? I'll say it again, absolutely disgraceful block. SirFozzie 07:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- 01:50 01:50, 10 August 2007 diff hist −16 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Insurgent sympathiser: Tyrenius: Jeez!
- 01:49 01:49, 10 August 2007 diff hist +1,047 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Insurgent sympathiser: Tyrenius: Vk didn't directly call anyone a liar
- 01:37 01:37, 10 August 2007 diff hist +155 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Insurgent sympathiser: Tyrenius: The insurgents have their own pet admin.
- 01:35 01:35, 10 August 2007 diff hist +463 User talk:84.13.156.208 Insurgent sympathiser: Tyrenius
- 01:25 01:25, 10 August 2007 diff hist +701 User talk:84.13.156.208 →MrDarcy: I asked the simple question: why no Arbcom? (My conclusion was that everybody was too scared of the team of insurgent sympathisers to do anything about their consistently biassed edi
- 01:14 01:14, 10 August 2007 diff hist +249 User talk:Vintagekits and who are you to say whether my comment is wanted or unwanted - another team editor? There must be loads of you team players lurking!
- 00:58 00:58, 10 August 2007 diff hist +1,076 User talk:84.13.156.208 He's got multiple socks is very uncivil and revert wars constantly. And yet nobody dares take him to an arbcom because they gnow the rest of the team will gang up on them
- 00:43 00:43, 10 August 2007 diff hist +249 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?: restoring comments censored by Vintagekits is in his own cause. I thought he could chop the section but not distort the loop?
- 00:35 00:35, 10 August 2007 diff hist +36 User talk:Vintagekits →Response to deleted messages 2: add sig
- 00:33 00:33, 10 August 2007 diff hist +36 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?: add sig
- 00:27 00:27, 10 August 2007 diff hist +621 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Vintagekits: it seems kinda freaky that these insurgent sympathisers can spread their hate and twist the truth
9 August 2007
- 23:14 23:14, 9 August 2007 diff hist +330 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions: == User_talk:Vintagekits history restored == Thanks for restoring the history, Rockpocket
- 23:09 23:09, 9 August 2007 diff hist +332 User talk:Vintagekits adding sig
- 22:49 22:49, 9 August 2007 diff hist +200 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Vintagekits: why are these insurgents allowed to get away with all this?
- 22:43 22:43, 9 August 2007 diff hist +430 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Vintagekits: that text in italics above wasn't there when I posted before. You can't see it now because you have airbrushed out the history of the edits on Vintagekiits user talk page
- 22:36 22:36, 9 August 2007 diff hist +1,389 User talk:84.13.156.208 it seems you are determined to protect these terrorists - I find I can't edit on your page
- 22:23 22:23, 9 August 2007 diff hist +63 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions: sig
- 22:22 22:22, 9 August 2007 diff hist +272 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions: Why have you now even censored the whole history of several weeks of contributions on Vintagekits talk page?
- 22:21 22:21, 9 August 2007 diff hist +286 User talk:84.13.156.208 As I made very clear earlier, I am not a new editor.
- 22:18 22:18, 9 August 2007 diff hist +79 User talk:84.13.156.208 I'm very sorry. I did not realise Vkits had been jailed. I will stop at once.
- 22:16 22:16, 9 August 2007 diff hist +353 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Vintagekits: Surely our First Amendment rights count for something even when we are posted overseas?
- 22:05 22:05, 9 August 2007 diff hist +379 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions: Why have you now even censored the whole history of several weeks of contributions on Vintagekits talk page?
- 22:01 22:01, 9 August 2007 diff hist +110 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions
- 21:54 21:54, 9 August 2007 diff hist +68 User talk:84.13.156.208 →Your deletions: == Vintagekits == Why is it edit warring by me to ask civil and pertinent questions?
- 21:52 21:52, 9 August 2007 diff hist +1,567 User talk:84.13.156.208 Why does he not wish to communicate with me?
- 21:43 21:43, 9 August 2007 diff hist +397 User talk:Vintagekits Why do you not wish me to communicate with you?
- 21:40 21:40, 9 August 2007 diff hist +397 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?: Why do you not wish me to communicate with you? Aplogies to other editors who's comments were deleted by mass reversion by Vintagekits
- 21:33 21:33, 9 August 2007 diff hist +49 User talk:Vintagekits Why do you not wish me to communicate with you?
- 21:32 21:32, 9 August 2007 diff hist −1 M62 coach bombing No edit summary
- 21:29 21:29, 9 August 2007 diff hist +397 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?
- 21:20 21:20, 9 August 2007 diff hist +219 User talk:Vintagekits I certainly think Vintagekits should be left alone to make useful contributions - but it's not a good sign that his first contribution to a co-operative project is to censor other editors and allege s
- 21:12 21:12, 9 August 2007 diff hist +2,753 User talk:Vintagekits →Welcome back
- 21:07 21:07, 9 August 2007 diff hist +56 User talk:Vintagekits →Response to deleted messages
- 21:03 21:03, 9 August 2007 diff hist +3,620 User talk:Vintagekits →Response to deleted messages
- 20:39 20:39, 9 August 2007 diff hist +476 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?
- 20:31 20:31, 9 August 2007 diff hist +283 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?
- 20:20 20:20, 9 August 2007 diff hist +843 User talk:Vintagekits restoring 2 editors comments removed by blocked user in violation of his parole and promises to exhibit improved behaviour
- 20:11 20:11, 9 August 2007 diff hist +33 User talk:Vintagekits →Why no arbcom?
- 20:06 20:06, 9 August 2007 diff hist +576 User talk:Vintagekits revert user on parole
- 19:52 19:52, 9 August 2007 diff hist +576 User talk:Vintagekits →[[Jamie Moore (boxer)|Jamie Moore]]
- 19:33 19:33, 9 August 2007 diff hist +2 John May (judge) copyedit. Isn't Wikipedia wonderful?
- 19:27 19:27, 9 August 2007 diff hist −1 M62 coach bombing No edit summary
|
| This is the
contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |