19 November 2009

• 00:12 00:12, 19 November 2009 diff hist +47‎ Talk:Representation theory ‎ →‎Funny definitions!

18 November 2009

• 19:55 19:55, 18 November 2009 diff hist +1,400‎ Talk:Representation theory ‎ →‎Funny definitions!: new section

17 November 2009

• 21:19 21:19, 17 November 2009 diff hist +387‎ BESK ‎ Some info on the basic architecture of BESK.
• 20:39 20:39, 17 November 2009 diff hist +17‎ Embedded system ‎ →‎CPU platforms: better headline (not only CPUs and often used without any "platform"),
• 17:20 17:20, 17 November 2009 diff hist +105‎ Framebuffer ‎ Who are you to say that's "incorrect"? This is a VERY common de-facto usage of the word, which is not unresonable in any way either. WP should document this.

14 November 2009

• 21:09 21:09, 14 November 2009 diff hist +1,924‎ Complex instruction set computer ‎ last good.
• 21:02 21:02, 14 November 2009 diff hist −230‎ MMX (instruction set) ‎ →‎Technical details: Less redundance, some additional detail.
• 20:21 20:21, 14 November 2009 diff hist −460‎ Instruction set architecture ‎ Please!, a stack machine with 1-address arithmetic instructions is NOT the same as an accumulator machine...! And, again, the transputer is a fairly typical practical stack machine, no "hybride".

13 November 2009

• 16:35 16:35, 13 November 2009 diff hist −430‎ Instruction set architecture ‎ If important(?) then reintroduce that (hidden and invisible) *comment* as a footnote, instead of destroying relevant edits of the actual text!

12 November 2009

• 18:20 18:20, 12 November 2009 diff hist +10‎ Random-access memory ‎No edit summary
• 00:59 00:59, 12 November 2009 diff hist +104‎ Cyrix 6x86 ‎ →‎Cyrix MII: some detail.

10 November 2009

• 00:26 00:26, 10 November 2009 diff hist −430‎ Instruction set architecture ‎ →‎Number of operands: The "transputer example" is the normal/typical one! Added example of stack machines with a single explicit operand as well.

8 November 2009

• 17:10 17:10, 8 November 2009 diff hist +10‎ PCLinuxOS ‎ →‎History: Is this about an OS or about packages?

7 November 2009

• 09:01 09:01, 7 November 2009 diff hist +166‎ Firmware ‎ more relevant format and details.

4 November 2009

• 16:56 16:56, 4 November 2009 diff hist −58‎ Byte ‎ And once more again: char encoding not the only reason it's the "basic addressable element"; "8-bit" is not an architecture; the word "platform" sort of recentism ;)
• 10:58 10:58, 4 November 2009 diff hist +5‎ Byte ‎No edit summary
• 10:56 10:56, 4 November 2009 diff hist +7‎ Byte ‎ Softening this statement a little, as directly bit-adressable designs exists.

3 November 2009

• 19:40 19:40, 3 November 2009 diff hist +154‎ Talk:Intel 8086 ‎ →‎Embedded processors with 256-byte paragraphs
• 19:28 19:28, 3 November 2009 diff hist +16‎ Intel 8086 ‎ another manufacturer

2 November 2009

• 18:13 18:13, 2 November 2009 diff hist −11‎ Synthesizer ‎ this is the synt, period.

1 October 2009

• 21:37 21:37, 1 October 2009 diff hist −40‎ Microprocessor ‎ fabless <=> not a manufacturer, only a designer firm.
• 21:35 21:35, 1 October 2009 diff hist +10‎ Microprocessor ‎ Undid revision 317179470 by 74.235.225.113 ( talk)

30 September 2009

• 17:24 17:24, 30 September 2009 diff hist +24‎ X86 ‎ That talk page comment makes no sense - the term "x86" IS generic and this sentence describes the actual situation today, not some hypothetical future...!

29 September 2009

• 16:24 16:24, 29 September 2009 diff hist +37‎ X86 ‎ restoring.