00:3100:31, 31 August 2017diffhist+220
Grímnismál
re-insert info with source. Yamaguchi, it says right above the edit window: 'If you are undoing an edit that is not vandalism, explain the reason in the edit summary.'
00:2800:28, 31 August 2017diffhist+228
Atlamál
re-adding the info again and adding the number of stanzas, with a source. As in the Vafþrúðnismál's article, I have no idea what Yamaguchi's problem with this is.
00:2400:24, 31 August 2017diffhist+248
Vafþrúðnismál
re-adding the information about metre and adding the number of stanzas, now with a source. Yamaguchi, it's beyond me why you thought it was a good idea to revert the previous edit.
21:1621:16, 23 August 2017diffhist−1,107
Gaut
Geats ≠ Goths & Gutes. Linguistically, 'Gaut' can only be the ancestor of the Geats and can 'survive' only in their name. There is no reason to identify the fictional eponym of the Geats with the fictional eponyms of the Goths and the Gutes.
00:3100:31, 31 August 2017diffhist+220
Grímnismál
re-insert info with source. Yamaguchi, it says right above the edit window: 'If you are undoing an edit that is not vandalism, explain the reason in the edit summary.'
00:2800:28, 31 August 2017diffhist+228
Atlamál
re-adding the info again and adding the number of stanzas, with a source. As in the Vafþrúðnismál's article, I have no idea what Yamaguchi's problem with this is.
00:2400:24, 31 August 2017diffhist+248
Vafþrúðnismál
re-adding the information about metre and adding the number of stanzas, now with a source. Yamaguchi, it's beyond me why you thought it was a good idea to revert the previous edit.
21:1621:16, 23 August 2017diffhist−1,107
Gaut
Geats ≠ Goths & Gutes. Linguistically, 'Gaut' can only be the ancestor of the Geats and can 'survive' only in their name. There is no reason to identify the fictional eponym of the Geats with the fictional eponyms of the Goths and the Gutes.