20:1220:12, 17 August 2023diffhist−151
Watford Gap
→Isogloss: someone wrote nonsensical text and cited it to a Wikipedia article. Such harmful editing being allowed to persist for a day or two would be appalling, but they did this *ten years ago*Tags: Revertedreferences removed
20:0420:04, 17 August 2023diffhist−554
River Leam
→Water quality: Regurgitating raw data is of little interest. Probably this whole section should be removed. If the water quality of the Leam has been reported in secondary sources, it should be noted in the article.Tag: Reverted
19:5719:57, 17 August 2023diffhist−358
River Leam
a historical name is not a significant alternative, and what the hell was "etc" supposed to mean?Tags: Revertedreferences removed
20:1220:12, 17 August 2023diffhist−151
Watford Gap
→Isogloss: someone wrote nonsensical text and cited it to a Wikipedia article. Such harmful editing being allowed to persist for a day or two would be appalling, but they did this *ten years ago*Tags: Revertedreferences removed
20:0420:04, 17 August 2023diffhist−554
River Leam
→Water quality: Regurgitating raw data is of little interest. Probably this whole section should be removed. If the water quality of the Leam has been reported in secondary sources, it should be noted in the article.Tag: Reverted
19:5719:57, 17 August 2023diffhist−358
River Leam
a historical name is not a significant alternative, and what the hell was "etc" supposed to mean?Tags: Revertedreferences removed