12:3112:31, 26 February 2016diffhist−33
Diehard tests
A quick search on Google Scholar yields hundreds of results. This article has problems, but notability isn't one of them.
05:3805:38, 19 February 2016diffhist+158
Paracetamol
Doc James, I think you need to consult a calculator. The text says that the cost per dose is $ 0.05, but $ 1.10 / 50 is about $ 0.02 per dose. That is a significant difference: text says $ 0.05, real world says $ 0.02.
01:2001:20, 7 February 2016diffhist−24
Definitely, Maybe
→Plot: Doesn't seem too detailed to me and apparently nobody else has been able to figure out what to cut since July, so let's remove the useless banner.
23:4523:45, 28 December 2015diffhist−792
Random number generation
→Computational methods: It does not have good randomness properties. MWC isn't that good to begin with, and concatenating the lower 16-bits of two just ensures that the most significant bits will at best have the short cycle of the upper. It's crap.
12:3112:31, 26 February 2016diffhist−33
Diehard tests
A quick search on Google Scholar yields hundreds of results. This article has problems, but notability isn't one of them.
05:3805:38, 19 February 2016diffhist+158
Paracetamol
Doc James, I think you need to consult a calculator. The text says that the cost per dose is $ 0.05, but $ 1.10 / 50 is about $ 0.02 per dose. That is a significant difference: text says $ 0.05, real world says $ 0.02.
01:2001:20, 7 February 2016diffhist−24
Definitely, Maybe
→Plot: Doesn't seem too detailed to me and apparently nobody else has been able to figure out what to cut since July, so let's remove the useless banner.
23:4523:45, 28 December 2015diffhist−792
Random number generation
→Computational methods: It does not have good randomness properties. MWC isn't that good to begin with, and concatenating the lower 16-bits of two just ensures that the most significant bits will at best have the short cycle of the upper. It's crap.