12:1912:19, 10 November 2022diffhist+38
Gharial
→Characteristics: Thank you, in any case the reference Erickson shows (both table of BF and graphic) that this data is relative to a 112 kg specimen, therefore is not descriptive of larger gharials
10:3610:36, 10 November 2022diffhist+369
Gharial
Both references (pre-existing Erickson 2012 and the new one) show the test was performed upon a 110 kg gharial, see the table and / or the graph they are equivalent. It is relevant since it shows a still relatively considerable bite force (around 170% its body mass).Tag: Reverted
12:1912:19, 10 November 2022diffhist+38
Gharial
→Characteristics: Thank you, in any case the reference Erickson shows (both table of BF and graphic) that this data is relative to a 112 kg specimen, therefore is not descriptive of larger gharials
10:3610:36, 10 November 2022diffhist+369
Gharial
Both references (pre-existing Erickson 2012 and the new one) show the test was performed upon a 110 kg gharial, see the table and / or the graph they are equivalent. It is relevant since it shows a still relatively considerable bite force (around 170% its body mass).Tag: Reverted