21:2721:27, 18 June 2019diffhist−18
Paul Allen
→Aerospace: WP:weasel wording. That something has been reported is almost always off topic & unnotable. Everything included has been "reported" because that's what's required to be includable. If we said "it was reported" for every purport, most of the page would be filled with "it was reported"s. If a source is reliable and it words something as a true fact, then we paraphrase that and also word it as a true fact, without resorting to
WP:weaselly "a (particular) source said X".
17 June 2019
19:2619:26, 17 June 2019diffhist−36
Paul Allen
→Aerospace: Removed the source from the main text where it is almost always off-topic (as it is here). Also, "seems" is an editorial
WP:OR. The source says so directly so it can be s
16:2216:22, 6 June 2019diffhist+184
Wingsuit flying
→History: 300 horizontal and 30 down makes for an L/D of 10:1 which is extremely dubious for such a low aspect ratio. The numbers here are almost certainly false.
20:5420:54, 28 May 2019diffhist−809
Transubstantiation
→Patristic period: Original conclusion (
WP:OR) based on primary sources. Sources are written by GW himself and don't discuss his general beliefs but specific issues. The multiple primary sources essentially say "see, my (original) conclusion is correct because look, here are some examples". Would actually need reliable secondary source(s) drawing that conclusion. Also, "many" is subjective, and it's a digression off topic onto GW.Tag: references removed
09:3109:31, 24 May 2019diffhist−7
TRAPPIST-1
Undid revision 898504271 by
Robert.Allen (
talk) We're supposed to be *paraphrasing* secondary sources, and only quoting them when the quote itself is notable. There's no clear reason to repeat the particular three words as a quotation, nothing notable there.Tag: Undo
22:2522:25, 23 May 2019diffhist−7
TRAPPIST-1
→Tidal locking: No need for the quotes, it's an ordinary paraphrasing of secondary source. Quotes here have the effect of making it look as if the writer thinks it's a little dubious.
21:3521:35, 23 May 2019diffhist+258
Known Space
It's not the poles that are in vacuum. Revised the description to fit the wording in "Crashlander".
20:0120:01, 23 May 2019diffhist−34
Known Space
Removed unneeded citation tag. Sources for in-world "facts" from works of fiction is always the work of fiction itself. Although, the *specific* Niven work (and page) containing this is unclear, that's true for every other fictional "fact" in this article and in other WP articles like it. Requiring "chapter and verse" citations in works of fiction could be done I suppose, but not doing it seems to be universally acceptable.
15:5115:51, 22 May 2019diffhist−173
Maryland Toleration Act
→Description: Weaselly wording. Worded so as to make the ref a primary source. Just one author's opinion. Dubious -- the distinction between such anti-insult and other anti-blasphemy is marginal and strained. Notability of the opinion not established by the primary source for it.Tag: references removed
21:2721:27, 18 June 2019diffhist−18
Paul Allen
→Aerospace: WP:weasel wording. That something has been reported is almost always off topic & unnotable. Everything included has been "reported" because that's what's required to be includable. If we said "it was reported" for every purport, most of the page would be filled with "it was reported"s. If a source is reliable and it words something as a true fact, then we paraphrase that and also word it as a true fact, without resorting to
WP:weaselly "a (particular) source said X".
17 June 2019
19:2619:26, 17 June 2019diffhist−36
Paul Allen
→Aerospace: Removed the source from the main text where it is almost always off-topic (as it is here). Also, "seems" is an editorial
WP:OR. The source says so directly so it can be s
16:2216:22, 6 June 2019diffhist+184
Wingsuit flying
→History: 300 horizontal and 30 down makes for an L/D of 10:1 which is extremely dubious for such a low aspect ratio. The numbers here are almost certainly false.
20:5420:54, 28 May 2019diffhist−809
Transubstantiation
→Patristic period: Original conclusion (
WP:OR) based on primary sources. Sources are written by GW himself and don't discuss his general beliefs but specific issues. The multiple primary sources essentially say "see, my (original) conclusion is correct because look, here are some examples". Would actually need reliable secondary source(s) drawing that conclusion. Also, "many" is subjective, and it's a digression off topic onto GW.Tag: references removed
09:3109:31, 24 May 2019diffhist−7
TRAPPIST-1
Undid revision 898504271 by
Robert.Allen (
talk) We're supposed to be *paraphrasing* secondary sources, and only quoting them when the quote itself is notable. There's no clear reason to repeat the particular three words as a quotation, nothing notable there.Tag: Undo
22:2522:25, 23 May 2019diffhist−7
TRAPPIST-1
→Tidal locking: No need for the quotes, it's an ordinary paraphrasing of secondary source. Quotes here have the effect of making it look as if the writer thinks it's a little dubious.
21:3521:35, 23 May 2019diffhist+258
Known Space
It's not the poles that are in vacuum. Revised the description to fit the wording in "Crashlander".
20:0120:01, 23 May 2019diffhist−34
Known Space
Removed unneeded citation tag. Sources for in-world "facts" from works of fiction is always the work of fiction itself. Although, the *specific* Niven work (and page) containing this is unclear, that's true for every other fictional "fact" in this article and in other WP articles like it. Requiring "chapter and verse" citations in works of fiction could be done I suppose, but not doing it seems to be universally acceptable.
15:5115:51, 22 May 2019diffhist−173
Maryland Toleration Act
→Description: Weaselly wording. Worded so as to make the ref a primary source. Just one author's opinion. Dubious -- the distinction between such anti-insult and other anti-blasphemy is marginal and strained. Notability of the opinion not established by the primary source for it.Tag: references removed