20:0620:06, 19 July 2022diffhist+108
The True Word
Noted lack of citation in 'Criticism... before Celsus'. While the article for the most part focuses on Celsus and his work, for which citations are naturally lacking, the section 'Criticism... before Celsus' relies heavily on the same single source, though much more is known about this topic.
13:4613:46, 6 July 2022diffhist+1
Serpent seed
Moved parenthetical description of Ham into parentheses, so as to not confuse with the following listed items separated by commas.
16:2116:21, 1 July 2022diffhist−777
Republican reactions to Donald Trump's claims of 2020 election fraud
Restored edits reverted by
EvergreenFir. Sufficient cause still not given for reversion. Please see initial edit summary for my justifications. The header above this section explicitly states "Note: this excludes Republicans who have only supported Trump's right to legally challenge the election results without explicitly supporting his election fraud claims". The sources for Abbott do not support his inclusion. If better sources are provided, he can stay.Tags: UndoRevertedreferences removed
20:0620:06, 19 July 2022diffhist+108
The True Word
Noted lack of citation in 'Criticism... before Celsus'. While the article for the most part focuses on Celsus and his work, for which citations are naturally lacking, the section 'Criticism... before Celsus' relies heavily on the same single source, though much more is known about this topic.
13:4613:46, 6 July 2022diffhist+1
Serpent seed
Moved parenthetical description of Ham into parentheses, so as to not confuse with the following listed items separated by commas.
16:2116:21, 1 July 2022diffhist−777
Republican reactions to Donald Trump's claims of 2020 election fraud
Restored edits reverted by
EvergreenFir. Sufficient cause still not given for reversion. Please see initial edit summary for my justifications. The header above this section explicitly states "Note: this excludes Republicans who have only supported Trump's right to legally challenge the election results without explicitly supporting his election fraud claims". The sources for Abbott do not support his inclusion. If better sources are provided, he can stay.Tags: UndoRevertedreferences removed