08:0408:04, 3 August 2020diffhist+2,405
Jenny Durkan
Undid revision 970938052 by
Rwnix404 (
talk) The controversy is mentioned in the text. Its about the courtcase, not the defendant. The subject of the article was the attorney for the case. It was noteworthy at the time, as the sources indicate. There are other articles that are not included because they were editorials. And which policy are you referring to? And I don't understand your definition of the word "slander". Its all sourced.Tags: Undopossible
BLP issue or vandalism
03:2003:20, 3 August 2020diffhist+4,142
Jenny Durkan
Undid revision 970909627 by
Drmies (
talk) okey dokey. It was perfectly reasonable of me to undo deletions when no good reason for their removal was provided. Please stop being disruptiveTags: Undopossible
BLP issue or vandalism
02:2202:22, 3 August 2020diffhist+4,142
Jenny Durkan
Undid revision 970891602 by
Drmies (
talk)Well, one of these subsections has been on this page since July 2017. The other is newer. I have read no good arguments as to why they should be deleted other than
WP:IDONTLIKEIT, so no, YOU can take it to the talk page before you delete long standing content.Tags: Undopossible
BLP issue or vandalism
06:5206:52, 7 July 2020diffhist−64
Jenny Durkan
→Handling of George Floyd protests: no need for all that. The point is that criticism is coming from various ideologies for completely different reasons. Its fascinating, in my opinion. Please consider expanding this entire section, since a lot is still left out.
08:0408:04, 3 August 2020diffhist+2,405
Jenny Durkan
Undid revision 970938052 by
Rwnix404 (
talk) The controversy is mentioned in the text. Its about the courtcase, not the defendant. The subject of the article was the attorney for the case. It was noteworthy at the time, as the sources indicate. There are other articles that are not included because they were editorials. And which policy are you referring to? And I don't understand your definition of the word "slander". Its all sourced.Tags: Undopossible
BLP issue or vandalism
03:2003:20, 3 August 2020diffhist+4,142
Jenny Durkan
Undid revision 970909627 by
Drmies (
talk) okey dokey. It was perfectly reasonable of me to undo deletions when no good reason for their removal was provided. Please stop being disruptiveTags: Undopossible
BLP issue or vandalism
02:2202:22, 3 August 2020diffhist+4,142
Jenny Durkan
Undid revision 970891602 by
Drmies (
talk)Well, one of these subsections has been on this page since July 2017. The other is newer. I have read no good arguments as to why they should be deleted other than
WP:IDONTLIKEIT, so no, YOU can take it to the talk page before you delete long standing content.Tags: Undopossible
BLP issue or vandalism
06:5206:52, 7 July 2020diffhist−64
Jenny Durkan
→Handling of George Floyd protests: no need for all that. The point is that criticism is coming from various ideologies for completely different reasons. Its fascinating, in my opinion. Please consider expanding this entire section, since a lot is still left out.