20:5920:59, 25 March 2020diffhist−3
Talk:Spanish flu
I understand about archive, but I also understand and that very little to nothing in Wikipedia is etched in stone. Like you are making out. Wiki-lawyering and picayune actions like this is actually against Wikipedia policy...regarding things like "
No Rules". Context. "Archive" or not. Sighs... Minor and not monumental. No (real or valid) reason to revert something like this.Tag: Undo
20:5120:51, 25 March 2020diffhist+9
Talk:Spanish flu
yeah, "being disruptive" because I refuse to be bullied by arrogant nit-picky editors who do Wiki-lawyering and nit-picky nonsense like this is actually against Wikipedia policy...regarding things like "
No Rules". Context. "Archive" or not. Sighs... Minor and not monumental. No (real or valid) reason to revert something like this. Seriously. Let it go. Or I'll JUST KEEP PUTTING IT BACK from different IP addresses anyway from time to time, anyway. Regards.....Tag: Undo
17:1317:13, 25 March 2020diffhist+9
Talk:Spanish flu
Wiki-lawyering and uptightness on every little thing is against WP policy and "No Rules".... it was MY comment to begin with, and there was a word I forgot to put. So please just leave it be. Not a big deal... Just one word ON MY OWN PREVIOUS COMMENT. Not a new comment. No reason to revert what I did. thank youTag: Undo
17:0317:03, 25 March 2020diffhist+9
Talk:Spanish flu
it was MY comment to begin with, and there was a word I forgot to put. So please just leave it be. Not a big deal... Just one word ON MY OWN PREVIOUS COMMENT. Not a new comment. No reason to revert what I did. Wiki-lawyering and uptnightness on every little thing is against WP policy and "No Rules".... thank you
20:5920:59, 25 March 2020diffhist−3
Talk:Spanish flu
I understand about archive, but I also understand and that very little to nothing in Wikipedia is etched in stone. Like you are making out. Wiki-lawyering and picayune actions like this is actually against Wikipedia policy...regarding things like "
No Rules". Context. "Archive" or not. Sighs... Minor and not monumental. No (real or valid) reason to revert something like this.Tag: Undo
20:5120:51, 25 March 2020diffhist+9
Talk:Spanish flu
yeah, "being disruptive" because I refuse to be bullied by arrogant nit-picky editors who do Wiki-lawyering and nit-picky nonsense like this is actually against Wikipedia policy...regarding things like "
No Rules". Context. "Archive" or not. Sighs... Minor and not monumental. No (real or valid) reason to revert something like this. Seriously. Let it go. Or I'll JUST KEEP PUTTING IT BACK from different IP addresses anyway from time to time, anyway. Regards.....Tag: Undo
17:1317:13, 25 March 2020diffhist+9
Talk:Spanish flu
Wiki-lawyering and uptightness on every little thing is against WP policy and "No Rules".... it was MY comment to begin with, and there was a word I forgot to put. So please just leave it be. Not a big deal... Just one word ON MY OWN PREVIOUS COMMENT. Not a new comment. No reason to revert what I did. thank youTag: Undo
17:0317:03, 25 March 2020diffhist+9
Talk:Spanish flu
it was MY comment to begin with, and there was a word I forgot to put. So please just leave it be. Not a big deal... Just one word ON MY OWN PREVIOUS COMMENT. Not a new comment. No reason to revert what I did. Wiki-lawyering and uptnightness on every little thing is against WP policy and "No Rules".... thank you