03:5803:58, 4 March 2016diffhist−105
Compton wavelength
think this is referring to inertial mass, as opposed to say, mass in a more "relativistic" form, such as energy--a bold guess
04:4804:48, 3 March 2016diffhist+11
Yukawa interaction
what one writes has nothing to do with the matter; it's all about the form that is chosen--this is unnecessary idiomatic language
04:4304:43, 3 March 2016diffhist+101
Yukawa interaction
clarify that this is an effective description, and that falloff is exponentially rapid, which is qualitatively different from the gradual gravitational or electromagnetic falloff, for example
01:3101:31, 2 March 2016diffhist+7
Grand Unified Theory
this sentence is completely out of left field (forbidden?, needing SSB?, explaining a heavy mass?); too much going on here that implies background knowledge not in article
01:0801:08, 2 March 2016diffhist+11
Grand Unified Theory
this seems circular; we are claiming unification at a known unification energy, but without having first motivated the existence of such a scale
03:3403:34, 1 March 2016diffhist+11
Spontaneous symmetry breaking
how does the word "spontaneous" relate to the word nothing (uncaused?)? The existing sentence seems to be trying to clarify, but doesn't make this connection obvious, so this is confusing
03:5803:58, 4 March 2016diffhist−105
Compton wavelength
think this is referring to inertial mass, as opposed to say, mass in a more "relativistic" form, such as energy--a bold guess
04:4804:48, 3 March 2016diffhist+11
Yukawa interaction
what one writes has nothing to do with the matter; it's all about the form that is chosen--this is unnecessary idiomatic language
04:4304:43, 3 March 2016diffhist+101
Yukawa interaction
clarify that this is an effective description, and that falloff is exponentially rapid, which is qualitatively different from the gradual gravitational or electromagnetic falloff, for example
01:3101:31, 2 March 2016diffhist+7
Grand Unified Theory
this sentence is completely out of left field (forbidden?, needing SSB?, explaining a heavy mass?); too much going on here that implies background knowledge not in article
01:0801:08, 2 March 2016diffhist+11
Grand Unified Theory
this seems circular; we are claiming unification at a known unification energy, but without having first motivated the existence of such a scale
03:3403:34, 1 March 2016diffhist+11
Spontaneous symmetry breaking
how does the word "spontaneous" relate to the word nothing (uncaused?)? The existing sentence seems to be trying to clarify, but doesn't make this connection obvious, so this is confusing