03:1203:12, 20 April 2009diffhist−68
Outline of Mexico
rv: NOT AT ALL like 'Outline of France' structure (with cardinal dir); stop adding impractical, obtuse & editing like a dick to make a point
03:0603:06, 20 April 2009diffhist−68
Outline of Mexico
partial rv: that is NOT AT ALL like 'Outline of France' structure (with cardinal dir) impractical; those 3 culture areas would be under Middle America anyway; +Latin America makes at least some sense
02:1902:19, 20 April 2009diffhist−68
Outline of Mexico
rv: I stand corrected, but this is NOT AT ALL like example I provided (re Outline of France > Eurasia > Europe > W/S Europe): these culture areas have little significance & are confusing
16:4716:47, 15 April 2009diffhist−365
Central America
rv irrelevant misplaced U.S. sources, that don't support assertion of what Latin Americans include in region - please produce - good-faith edits aren't vandalismTag: references removed
22:2622:26, 10 April 2009diffhist−364
Central America
rv irrelevant misplaced U.S. sources, that don't support assertion of what Latin Americans include in regionTag: references removed
19:0019:00, 7 April 2009diffhist−364
Central America
rv: this is a SPECIFIC pt: these are U.S. sources, & don't support assertion of what Latin Americans include in CA, etc.; provide relevant sources on talk pg for scrutiny or you will be rvdTag: references removed
05:3805:38, 7 April 2009diffhist−363
Central America
rv: can you read English? These are U.S. sources, & don't support assertion of what Latin Americans include in CA, etc.; provide relevant sources on talk page for scrutiny or you will be rvdTag: references removed
5 April 2009
22:2322:23, 5 April 2009diffhist−365
Central America
these are U.S. sources, and do not support assertion that Mexico is considered part of North America in Latin America, etc.Tag: references removed
16:0616:06, 5 April 2009diffhist−3
NORAD
restoring traditional spellout: even the NORAD website notes this, only 1 other online instance of prior spuellout
03:1203:12, 20 April 2009diffhist−68
Outline of Mexico
rv: NOT AT ALL like 'Outline of France' structure (with cardinal dir); stop adding impractical, obtuse & editing like a dick to make a point
03:0603:06, 20 April 2009diffhist−68
Outline of Mexico
partial rv: that is NOT AT ALL like 'Outline of France' structure (with cardinal dir) impractical; those 3 culture areas would be under Middle America anyway; +Latin America makes at least some sense
02:1902:19, 20 April 2009diffhist−68
Outline of Mexico
rv: I stand corrected, but this is NOT AT ALL like example I provided (re Outline of France > Eurasia > Europe > W/S Europe): these culture areas have little significance & are confusing
16:4716:47, 15 April 2009diffhist−365
Central America
rv irrelevant misplaced U.S. sources, that don't support assertion of what Latin Americans include in region - please produce - good-faith edits aren't vandalismTag: references removed
22:2622:26, 10 April 2009diffhist−364
Central America
rv irrelevant misplaced U.S. sources, that don't support assertion of what Latin Americans include in regionTag: references removed
19:0019:00, 7 April 2009diffhist−364
Central America
rv: this is a SPECIFIC pt: these are U.S. sources, & don't support assertion of what Latin Americans include in CA, etc.; provide relevant sources on talk pg for scrutiny or you will be rvdTag: references removed
05:3805:38, 7 April 2009diffhist−363
Central America
rv: can you read English? These are U.S. sources, & don't support assertion of what Latin Americans include in CA, etc.; provide relevant sources on talk page for scrutiny or you will be rvdTag: references removed
5 April 2009
22:2322:23, 5 April 2009diffhist−365
Central America
these are U.S. sources, and do not support assertion that Mexico is considered part of North America in Latin America, etc.Tag: references removed
16:0616:06, 5 April 2009diffhist−3
NORAD
restoring traditional spellout: even the NORAD website notes this, only 1 other online instance of prior spuellout