14 August 2009

• 07:20 07:20, 14 August 2009 diff hist +20‎ Chuck Berry ‎ Links
• 07:18 07:18, 14 August 2009 diff hist −13‎ Chuck Berry ‎ Good writing but non encyclopedic in style.
• 06:34 06:34, 14 August 2009 diff hist +4‎ Les Paul ‎ link

11 August 2009

• 21:50 21:50, 11 August 2009 diff hist −10‎ Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 ‎ Fragmented is a vague term
• 21:09 21:09, 11 August 2009 diff hist −248‎ Abington School District v. Schempp ‎ Uncited opinion and POV as many claim its a misinterpretation of Establishment clause, not that they are against seperation of church and state.

17 July 2009

• 04:00 04:00, 17 July 2009 diff hist −103‎ Fox News ‎ →‎Slogan: Obvious bias is pov and this is uncited.

15 July 2009

• 21:14 21:14, 15 July 2009 diff hist −394‎ Cosmological argument ‎ Undid revision 300799542 by 129.67.39.207 ( talk) Uncited.
• 21:11 21:11, 15 July 2009 diff hist −22‎ Template:Atheism sidebar ‎ Atheism could be a religion and so isn't necessarily antireligious.
• 21:10 21:10, 15 July 2009 diff hist −61‎ Template:Atheism sidebar ‎ You can be a secular humanist and/or believe in naturalism and not be an atheist. They don't necessarily go together.

26 May 2009

• 05:00 05:00, 26 May 2009 diff hist +5‎ Star Trek: The Original Series ‎ →‎Cast

25 May 2009

• 20:36 20:36, 25 May 2009 diff hist −21‎ War Powers Resolution ‎ →‎History: President of US already linked so I just made this a link to Nixon only

7 May 2009

• 07:55 07:55, 7 May 2009 diff hist −1,804‎ Cosmological argument ‎ →‎Scientific positions: The cited article doesn't say anything about this having to do with the cosmological argument, nor does it argue there is no beginning to time.

6 May 2009

• 18:06 18:06, 6 May 2009 diff hist −26‎ Template:God arguments ‎ But arguing the burden of proof is on theists is not the same as arguing they are wrong which this argument would need to do to be an argument against God's existence
• 05:41 05:41, 6 May 2009 diff hist −26‎ Template:God arguments ‎ That's not an argument against the existence of God per se but one about who has the burden of proof regarding untestable assertions.

2 May 2009

• 07:30 07:30, 2 May 2009 diff hist +4‎ Johannes Kepler ‎ →‎The Supernova of 1604

17 April 2009

• 09:06 09:06, 17 April 2009 diff hist +792‎ Talk:Argument from inconsistent revelations ‎No edit summary
• 08:55 08:55, 17 April 2009 diff hist −172‎ Occam's razor ‎ →‎Religion: "Today's subjects" are still heavily influenced by the Church or other religions so this is a little inaccurate.
• 08:42 08:42, 17 April 2009 diff hist +8‎ Ontological argument ‎ →‎Alexander R. Pruss and Samkara's dictum: This needs a ref. and it's poorly worded. Is the last part from Plantinga or is is argueing with him, can't really tell?
• 08:38 08:38, 17 April 2009 diff hist −218‎ Ontological argument ‎ →‎Gaunilo's island: Not referenced and its not necessarily special pleading to argue the greatest being is a different kind of entity than all other entities.