19:0619:06, 8 August 2014diffhist−39
Linguistics
Undid revision 618182051. Citing SOURCES of another article is not circular reference. UNIVERSAL real world practice IS classification of linguistics as a science. There are no citations anywhere that linguistics as a *field* is part of the humanities.
20:3020:30, 22 July 2014diffhist−39
Linguistics
Undid revision 618025637They do NOT outweigh sources in the humanities(!), linguistics, cognitive, social, and behavioral science articles describing linguistics as one of many sorts of science and the ABSENCE of ANY claims declaring it of the humanities.
19:1719:17, 22 July 2014diffhist−39
Linguistics
Undid revision 618011089 by
Pfold (
talk) Institutional ontologies are not authoritative descriptions of what a field is. Look at the humanities article.
19:0619:06, 8 August 2014diffhist−39
Linguistics
Undid revision 618182051. Citing SOURCES of another article is not circular reference. UNIVERSAL real world practice IS classification of linguistics as a science. There are no citations anywhere that linguistics as a *field* is part of the humanities.
20:3020:30, 22 July 2014diffhist−39
Linguistics
Undid revision 618025637They do NOT outweigh sources in the humanities(!), linguistics, cognitive, social, and behavioral science articles describing linguistics as one of many sorts of science and the ABSENCE of ANY claims declaring it of the humanities.
19:1719:17, 22 July 2014diffhist−39
Linguistics
Undid revision 618011089 by
Pfold (
talk) Institutional ontologies are not authoritative descriptions of what a field is. Look at the humanities article.