17:2017:20, 11 May 2011diffhist−4
History of Korea
More arbitrary Korean nationalist claims. This is of course NOT allowed as a credible source: http://rki.kbs.co.krTag: references removed
17:1617:16, 11 May 2011diffhist−166
Dangun
Dangun is not "semi-legendary. There is ABSOLUTELY NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE that Dangun was a real person. Why is all the Korea-related material on Wikipedia so biased??
17:1317:13, 11 May 2011diffhist−207
Dangun
You are ABSOLUTELY NOT ALLOWED to use arbitrary blogs to support your notion that Dangun was somehow an actual person. Korean Nationalist historiographies are NOT allowed to be the only historical discourse on Wikipedia!
16:5416:54, 11 May 2011diffhist+7
History of Korea
Please.. there is no such thing as "Korean" pottery in 8000 BCE!! This article is really bad about historical facts and dating. Wow.
17:2017:20, 11 May 2011diffhist−4
History of Korea
More arbitrary Korean nationalist claims. This is of course NOT allowed as a credible source: http://rki.kbs.co.krTag: references removed
17:1617:16, 11 May 2011diffhist−166
Dangun
Dangun is not "semi-legendary. There is ABSOLUTELY NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE that Dangun was a real person. Why is all the Korea-related material on Wikipedia so biased??
17:1317:13, 11 May 2011diffhist−207
Dangun
You are ABSOLUTELY NOT ALLOWED to use arbitrary blogs to support your notion that Dangun was somehow an actual person. Korean Nationalist historiographies are NOT allowed to be the only historical discourse on Wikipedia!
16:5416:54, 11 May 2011diffhist+7
History of Korea
Please.. there is no such thing as "Korean" pottery in 8000 BCE!! This article is really bad about historical facts and dating. Wow.