15:1315:13, 17 May 2017diffhist+3,334
Siddhartha Mukherjee
Agree with Chandamma to retain original language, but condensed section. Criticism etc has to be concise and readable in 3 paragraphs. Extensive/ selective/copyrighted quotes unnecessary..readers need to get the main point
15:0315:03, 17 May 2017diffhist+2
Siddhartha Mukherjee
Agree w/ Chandamma and Well Attenuated (BOTH) and have used their edits and language. However, the section should be shortened and condensed. Criticism should be in point form and not take up half a page of text. Readers want to know main points.
15:0215:02, 17 May 2017diffhist−4,165
Siddhartha Mukherjee
Agree w/ Chandamma and Well Attenuated (BOTH) and have used their edits and language. However, the section should be shortened and condensed. Criticism should be in point form and not take up half a page of text. Readers want to know main points.
15:1315:13, 17 May 2017diffhist+3,334
Siddhartha Mukherjee
Agree with Chandamma to retain original language, but condensed section. Criticism etc has to be concise and readable in 3 paragraphs. Extensive/ selective/copyrighted quotes unnecessary..readers need to get the main point
15:0315:03, 17 May 2017diffhist+2
Siddhartha Mukherjee
Agree w/ Chandamma and Well Attenuated (BOTH) and have used their edits and language. However, the section should be shortened and condensed. Criticism should be in point form and not take up half a page of text. Readers want to know main points.
15:0215:02, 17 May 2017diffhist−4,165
Siddhartha Mukherjee
Agree w/ Chandamma and Well Attenuated (BOTH) and have used their edits and language. However, the section should be shortened and condensed. Criticism should be in point form and not take up half a page of text. Readers want to know main points.