19:4719:47, 21 October 2023diffhist+30
Reinhard Gehlen
AFAICR, "demarcate" is used incorrectly, both the wrong definition AND it's missing the required object needed for all transitive verbs. So 'fixed it.Tag: Reverted
14:0714:07, 18 October 2023diffhist−860
Tyler Childers
The article subject has produced activist works that help define his notability. They are NOT incidental to his works but by his own account the or at least A primary purpose of them, especially Long Violent History. He has voluntarily assumed the role of "influencer" and much has been written in published SECONDARY source material AS WELL AS HIS OWN. Blanking or hiding this info does not only a great disservice to readers but to the musician HIMSELF!Tag: references removed
13:2113:21, 18 October 2023diffhist+74
Education in Finland
'Added several more citation tags. I haven't edited articles on this particular subject, but AFAICT there should BE LOTS of uncontroversial source material to back up the claims if they are accurate.
12:5812:58, 18 October 2023diffhist+118
Education in Finland
This article is GROSSLY under-referenced; it looks like about 70 percent or more is just made up from editors' personal knowledge or whims or whatever. Moreoever, there are various tags to this effect that have been placed 1-2 years ago or LONGER. Either the editors didn't know or disregarded that 1 of the most basic "pillars" of all WP editing is NO ORIGINAL RESEARCH. I would invite editors to add competent citations that faithfully reflect their contributions, OR expect large scale deletions
18:2918:29, 17 October 2023diffhist−5
Tyler Childers
I don't think the statement appears in the video; but if someone finds it there, please add it back and state in your edit summary WHERE in video it appears.
11:5011:50, 17 October 2023diffhist−55
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
This article is supposed to be about CGEM, NOT his dad and not his dad's mistress's dad! It's a logical inconsistency to first parenthesize who the dad's mistress's dad was, and then go on about the dad's mistress's dad. The link is there, so if anyone cares, they can go right to the article about the dad's mistress's dad!
11:2611:26, 17 October 2023diffhist+54
Finnish Civil War
After I read the cited source carefully, it's clear the assertion I edited earlier as to who won and who lost, is directly contradicted by that source. As such, I have changed it.
10:5110:51, 17 October 2023diffhist−4
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
Grammar correction: Neither thing the use of the present perfect implies applies here. Rel drive-by editing of this article without citing sources, it would behoove editors, especially those promoting M's negative legacy to start citing valid sources IN their edits if the sources are uncontroversial and the edits are FAITHFUL to those sources. Otherwise, please DISCUSS in Talk section first. If qualifying sources will not be added, the content will have to be deleted.
10:4210:42, 17 October 2023diffhist+1
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
Add new paragraph for contrasting opinion. It's not terribly controversial that M divides opinions, although that, too, needs to be sourced. (When the edit was originally contributed, there was a reference, AFAICR, to an article in Iltalehti magazine, which is at least better than nothing.)
10:3710:37, 17 October 2023diffhist+11
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
Rearrange content to more logical flow; also grammar correction: writing one's memoirs and dying are separate events and need to be treated as separate predicates. Re recent edit about white terror, this is UNSOURCED. See
WP:No original research. And it doesn't correspond exactly to the limited, ALSO UNSOURCED content in the body of the article. If this material is not going to be sourced to qualified published scholars, it ALL needs to be jettisoned.
10:2010:20, 17 October 2023diffhist+9
Finnish Civil War
It's unclear what antecedent the editor had in mind when s/he used the possessive pronoun "its"; kinda' looks like it refers to the SDP. In any case, the SDP LOST the war. The cited source may be a little confusing to those not familiar with Finnish history of that period; but it's an uncontroversial, uncontradicted fact that the SDP was on the losing side.
09:4109:41, 17 October 2023diffhist−130
Finnish Civil War
This statement is a gross example of original research. See
WP:No original research. The source cited a few sentences on in no way supports this opinion. Moreoever, the ONLY way this statement qualifiies for inclusion here WITHOUT QUALIFICATION is if a consensus of scholars holds this 2B the case.
19:4719:47, 21 October 2023diffhist+30
Reinhard Gehlen
AFAICR, "demarcate" is used incorrectly, both the wrong definition AND it's missing the required object needed for all transitive verbs. So 'fixed it.Tag: Reverted
14:0714:07, 18 October 2023diffhist−860
Tyler Childers
The article subject has produced activist works that help define his notability. They are NOT incidental to his works but by his own account the or at least A primary purpose of them, especially Long Violent History. He has voluntarily assumed the role of "influencer" and much has been written in published SECONDARY source material AS WELL AS HIS OWN. Blanking or hiding this info does not only a great disservice to readers but to the musician HIMSELF!Tag: references removed
13:2113:21, 18 October 2023diffhist+74
Education in Finland
'Added several more citation tags. I haven't edited articles on this particular subject, but AFAICT there should BE LOTS of uncontroversial source material to back up the claims if they are accurate.
12:5812:58, 18 October 2023diffhist+118
Education in Finland
This article is GROSSLY under-referenced; it looks like about 70 percent or more is just made up from editors' personal knowledge or whims or whatever. Moreoever, there are various tags to this effect that have been placed 1-2 years ago or LONGER. Either the editors didn't know or disregarded that 1 of the most basic "pillars" of all WP editing is NO ORIGINAL RESEARCH. I would invite editors to add competent citations that faithfully reflect their contributions, OR expect large scale deletions
18:2918:29, 17 October 2023diffhist−5
Tyler Childers
I don't think the statement appears in the video; but if someone finds it there, please add it back and state in your edit summary WHERE in video it appears.
11:5011:50, 17 October 2023diffhist−55
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
This article is supposed to be about CGEM, NOT his dad and not his dad's mistress's dad! It's a logical inconsistency to first parenthesize who the dad's mistress's dad was, and then go on about the dad's mistress's dad. The link is there, so if anyone cares, they can go right to the article about the dad's mistress's dad!
11:2611:26, 17 October 2023diffhist+54
Finnish Civil War
After I read the cited source carefully, it's clear the assertion I edited earlier as to who won and who lost, is directly contradicted by that source. As such, I have changed it.
10:5110:51, 17 October 2023diffhist−4
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
Grammar correction: Neither thing the use of the present perfect implies applies here. Rel drive-by editing of this article without citing sources, it would behoove editors, especially those promoting M's negative legacy to start citing valid sources IN their edits if the sources are uncontroversial and the edits are FAITHFUL to those sources. Otherwise, please DISCUSS in Talk section first. If qualifying sources will not be added, the content will have to be deleted.
10:4210:42, 17 October 2023diffhist+1
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
Add new paragraph for contrasting opinion. It's not terribly controversial that M divides opinions, although that, too, needs to be sourced. (When the edit was originally contributed, there was a reference, AFAICR, to an article in Iltalehti magazine, which is at least better than nothing.)
10:3710:37, 17 October 2023diffhist+11
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
Rearrange content to more logical flow; also grammar correction: writing one's memoirs and dying are separate events and need to be treated as separate predicates. Re recent edit about white terror, this is UNSOURCED. See
WP:No original research. And it doesn't correspond exactly to the limited, ALSO UNSOURCED content in the body of the article. If this material is not going to be sourced to qualified published scholars, it ALL needs to be jettisoned.
10:2010:20, 17 October 2023diffhist+9
Finnish Civil War
It's unclear what antecedent the editor had in mind when s/he used the possessive pronoun "its"; kinda' looks like it refers to the SDP. In any case, the SDP LOST the war. The cited source may be a little confusing to those not familiar with Finnish history of that period; but it's an uncontroversial, uncontradicted fact that the SDP was on the losing side.
09:4109:41, 17 October 2023diffhist−130
Finnish Civil War
This statement is a gross example of original research. See
WP:No original research. The source cited a few sentences on in no way supports this opinion. Moreoever, the ONLY way this statement qualifiies for inclusion here WITHOUT QUALIFICATION is if a consensus of scholars holds this 2B the case.