06:2606:26, 16 June 2011diffhist0
Agoraphobia
Fear OR panic attacks, not OF (as a diagnosee, I know that the panic attacks themselves do not cause me fear.)
17:0717:07, 5 June 2011diffhist−1,221
User talk:50.80.139.102
I could care less. Then other editors can have some dillignence and look through my edit history. There's a reason I state what I'm doing in my summaries: I'm not hiding anything. Those issues are not current- if someone wants history go there.
16:3416:34, 5 June 2011diffhist−920
User talk:50.80.139.102
Orly? I already noticed the report on the Admin noticeboard. Just because I'm an IP user doesn't mean I'm a brain'dead that can't pay attention. Silly bot and silly Wikipedians.
04:5604:56, 5 June 2011diffhist−30
Alchemy
You need to freakin' stop. The content that you are complaining about already has a maintenance template, it does NOT need two.
04:5104:51, 5 June 2011diffhist−30
Alchemy
And people say I'm guilty of edit warring. Well I hate to tell you this, but I'm correct, one refimprove is all that is needed for the same content.
04:4604:46, 5 June 2011diffhist−30
Alchemy
Umm. No. Two refimprove templates for the same content in not needed. When appropriate citations are made, the original research will be apparent.
04:4204:42, 5 June 2011diffhist−30
Alchemy
The existing refimprove will take care of the original research that needs cleaned up.
06:2606:26, 16 June 2011diffhist0
Agoraphobia
Fear OR panic attacks, not OF (as a diagnosee, I know that the panic attacks themselves do not cause me fear.)
17:0717:07, 5 June 2011diffhist−1,221
User talk:50.80.139.102
I could care less. Then other editors can have some dillignence and look through my edit history. There's a reason I state what I'm doing in my summaries: I'm not hiding anything. Those issues are not current- if someone wants history go there.
16:3416:34, 5 June 2011diffhist−920
User talk:50.80.139.102
Orly? I already noticed the report on the Admin noticeboard. Just because I'm an IP user doesn't mean I'm a brain'dead that can't pay attention. Silly bot and silly Wikipedians.
04:5604:56, 5 June 2011diffhist−30
Alchemy
You need to freakin' stop. The content that you are complaining about already has a maintenance template, it does NOT need two.
04:5104:51, 5 June 2011diffhist−30
Alchemy
And people say I'm guilty of edit warring. Well I hate to tell you this, but I'm correct, one refimprove is all that is needed for the same content.
04:4604:46, 5 June 2011diffhist−30
Alchemy
Umm. No. Two refimprove templates for the same content in not needed. When appropriate citations are made, the original research will be apparent.
04:4204:42, 5 June 2011diffhist−30
Alchemy
The existing refimprove will take care of the original research that needs cleaned up.