17:0217:02, 26 February 2024diffhist−892
User talk:50.47.190.141
Do not create articles of fictitious nature to promote you pseduoscience crackpot theories then spam delete discussions to hide any challenges to the article. The talk section is not for you to scrub any challenges under some guise of improvement.currentTag: Blanking
16:5916:59, 26 February 2024diffhist+4,220
Talk:Arab migrations to the Maghreb
You need to engage with discussion instead of trying to hide it. The burden is on you to cite sufficient and relevant sources. That means legitimate sources from academics or institutions or at least a preponderance of sources that substantiate the otherwise very obvious pseudoscience nature of this article.Tag: Undo
14:1414:14, 26 February 2024diffhist+4,220
Talk:Arab migrations to the Maghreb
Combative remarks from user Skitash ("soapbox", "nonsense") do not address the article's failure to cite sufficient sources to justify the existence of the article's highly speculative subject matter. The article is a fictitious fabrication at best but more concerning is that this is someone's personal pseudoscience theory.Tags: UndoReverted
17:0217:02, 26 February 2024diffhist−892
User talk:50.47.190.141
Do not create articles of fictitious nature to promote you pseduoscience crackpot theories then spam delete discussions to hide any challenges to the article. The talk section is not for you to scrub any challenges under some guise of improvement.currentTag: Blanking
16:5916:59, 26 February 2024diffhist+4,220
Talk:Arab migrations to the Maghreb
You need to engage with discussion instead of trying to hide it. The burden is on you to cite sufficient and relevant sources. That means legitimate sources from academics or institutions or at least a preponderance of sources that substantiate the otherwise very obvious pseudoscience nature of this article.Tag: Undo
14:1414:14, 26 February 2024diffhist+4,220
Talk:Arab migrations to the Maghreb
Combative remarks from user Skitash ("soapbox", "nonsense") do not address the article's failure to cite sufficient sources to justify the existence of the article's highly speculative subject matter. The article is a fictitious fabrication at best but more concerning is that this is someone's personal pseudoscience theory.Tags: UndoReverted