05:5205:52, 17 November 2013diffhist−421
PageRank
→Algorithm: sorry, assertion in this para doesn't appear borne out by the description below (outbound links don't hurt you) and parts of it aren't totally clear
06:2406:24, 9 October 2013diffhist−33
Go (programming language)
"compared to some popular languages" still puts too much focus on comparing, when the point is more that these are the particular features/non-features of Go
06:1106:11, 9 October 2013diffhist−277
Go (programming language)
make Description the lead section. also, i think leading with an explicit comparison to Java/C# could wrongly make the whole article sound like a comparison, when it's not, so cut that
05:4105:41, 9 October 2013diffhist+458
Go (programming language)
→Interface system: okay, make the interfaces example do something (run SHA-256 on a test input). i *think* it's a somewhat realistic example for coders. also shows demoes adding methods to a non-struct, something article hasn't otherwise touched
06:3206:32, 6 October 2013diffhist0
Go (programming language)
→Interface system: had said 'any reuqired methods' instead of 'the required methods' because of interface{}, but it's just confusing to worry about it and 'the' may still be technically correct (it's just 'the 0 required methods' for interface{})
05:5205:52, 17 November 2013diffhist−421
PageRank
→Algorithm: sorry, assertion in this para doesn't appear borne out by the description below (outbound links don't hurt you) and parts of it aren't totally clear
06:2406:24, 9 October 2013diffhist−33
Go (programming language)
"compared to some popular languages" still puts too much focus on comparing, when the point is more that these are the particular features/non-features of Go
06:1106:11, 9 October 2013diffhist−277
Go (programming language)
make Description the lead section. also, i think leading with an explicit comparison to Java/C# could wrongly make the whole article sound like a comparison, when it's not, so cut that
05:4105:41, 9 October 2013diffhist+458
Go (programming language)
→Interface system: okay, make the interfaces example do something (run SHA-256 on a test input). i *think* it's a somewhat realistic example for coders. also shows demoes adding methods to a non-struct, something article hasn't otherwise touched
06:3206:32, 6 October 2013diffhist0
Go (programming language)
→Interface system: had said 'any reuqired methods' instead of 'the required methods' because of interface{}, but it's just confusing to worry about it and 'the' may still be technically correct (it's just 'the 0 required methods' for interface{})