03:5503:55, 27 March 2021diffhist−7
Battle of Cao Bằng (1979)
→Battle: Previous edit was making 5 days look like it was months. it's less than a week. To give a fair comparison, it took western front (Anzacs) in ww2 several months to make that ground in Turkey. Removed biased language.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
03:4803:48, 27 March 2021diffhist−243
Battle of Cao Bằng (1979)
Narrative is too politically motivated. The concrete facts was that the city was captured and it took around 6 days to achieve that. Not 6 years or months. To claim that one side outperformed is a political biased speculation when the city fell in only days. Removed biased language and retained the hard concrete facts that were essentially omitted.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
00:4500:45, 27 March 2021diffhist−85
Battle of Lạng Sơn (1979)
No need to repeat info. It took 3 days to occupy the city and dislodge its defenders. The below paragraph already states "After three days of bloody house-to-house fighting, Lạng Sơn fell on 6 March. The PLA then took the southern heights above Lạng Sơn." below.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
00:3300:33, 27 March 2021diffhist−247
Battle of Lạng Sơn (1979)
Removed very biased and inaccurate language. It took three days of house-to-house fighting, for Lạng Sơn to fall on 6 March. There's no need for political biased narrative in exaggerating 3 days of fighting as if it was weeks or months. 3 days is short and previous edit is excessively biased and spinning.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
03:5503:55, 27 March 2021diffhist−7
Battle of Cao Bằng (1979)
→Battle: Previous edit was making 5 days look like it was months. it's less than a week. To give a fair comparison, it took western front (Anzacs) in ww2 several months to make that ground in Turkey. Removed biased language.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
03:4803:48, 27 March 2021diffhist−243
Battle of Cao Bằng (1979)
Narrative is too politically motivated. The concrete facts was that the city was captured and it took around 6 days to achieve that. Not 6 years or months. To claim that one side outperformed is a political biased speculation when the city fell in only days. Removed biased language and retained the hard concrete facts that were essentially omitted.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
00:4500:45, 27 March 2021diffhist−85
Battle of Lạng Sơn (1979)
No need to repeat info. It took 3 days to occupy the city and dislodge its defenders. The below paragraph already states "After three days of bloody house-to-house fighting, Lạng Sơn fell on 6 March. The PLA then took the southern heights above Lạng Sơn." below.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
00:3300:33, 27 March 2021diffhist−247
Battle of Lạng Sơn (1979)
Removed very biased and inaccurate language. It took three days of house-to-house fighting, for Lạng Sơn to fall on 6 March. There's no need for political biased narrative in exaggerating 3 days of fighting as if it was weeks or months. 3 days is short and previous edit is excessively biased and spinning.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit