14:2814:28, 23 October 2020diffhist+449
Bolivia
You yourself is assumung that ethical hacking is corrupt despite that is a specualtion. And their report is still worthy to be added to wiki. Additionally you yourself even used ethical hacking as a mouthpiece and added out their findings that you liked. So don't have double standards. you can't accuse them of being corrupt whilst also publishing their findings. you contradict yourself and AGAIN - TAKE IT TO TALK PAGE BEFORE DELETING IT AGAINTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
14:1914:19, 23 October 2020diffhist+617
Bolivia
Not a speculation. Cepr is a well known insitute whose findings are facts in which OAS has not even denied. Take it to the talk page if you disagree and make your agruments but don't delete info that is backed by authoriatiuve sources. https://cepr.net/the-oas-misused-its-own-data-to-help-fabricate-its-accusation-of-fraud-against-evo-morales/Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
13:5013:50, 23 October 2020diffhist+671
Bolivia
Don't delete real info about David Rosnick again. Not even OAS even dispute his findings that OAS has wrongfully ordered the timestamps in the tally sheets alphabetically rather than chronologically aka a coding error, and hence had flawed data to make their conclusions. https://cepr.net/the-oas-misused-its-own-data-to-help-fabricate-its-accusation-of-fraud-against-evo-morales/Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
13:2313:23, 23 October 2020diffhist+404
Bolivia
Don't delete info about Ethical Hacking's finding. Added ethical hacking info again and their conclusions and source.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
09:0509:05, 23 October 2020diffhist+2,752
Bolivia
→Interim government 2019–present: My last bad edit was simply using Grammarly to correct the previous grammatical mistakes and then click publish but it somehow came out weird and was not on purpose., Yet people are too willing to use it as an excuse to label me a vandal and delete all my edits opportunistically, but I am willing to take this to talk page if anyone wants to argue but just don't censore illegally., Discuss on the talk page, don't delete everything. That;s how wiki should...Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
07:5207:52, 23 October 2020diffhist+33
Bolivia
The subsequent sentences is out of place and has grammatical errors. Transitioned the later sentence to make it tad more smoother.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
07:4607:46, 23 October 2020diffhist+409
Bolivia
It wasn't just domestic civillians asking Morales to leave. The military pr at least the head of the military also took their side in pressuring Morales out and even afterwards, and Anez threatened to prosecute Morales if he returns. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/13/morales-bolivia-military-coupTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
07:1407:14, 23 October 2020diffhist+60
Bolivia
The editor who said that Morales wasn't leading enough in the quick tallly, is actually both spinning and dececing. Firstly it gave the impression that Morales count went up significantrly in the quick tally and then the final tally. That is simply not true at all. The changes were very slight between the quick count and final tally and also Morales had a ten point lead in both counts, I added in the EXACT SPECIFIC Tally counts to give a more accurate and less misleading picture of the talliesTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
14:2814:28, 23 October 2020diffhist+449
Bolivia
You yourself is assumung that ethical hacking is corrupt despite that is a specualtion. And their report is still worthy to be added to wiki. Additionally you yourself even used ethical hacking as a mouthpiece and added out their findings that you liked. So don't have double standards. you can't accuse them of being corrupt whilst also publishing their findings. you contradict yourself and AGAIN - TAKE IT TO TALK PAGE BEFORE DELETING IT AGAINTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
14:1914:19, 23 October 2020diffhist+617
Bolivia
Not a speculation. Cepr is a well known insitute whose findings are facts in which OAS has not even denied. Take it to the talk page if you disagree and make your agruments but don't delete info that is backed by authoriatiuve sources. https://cepr.net/the-oas-misused-its-own-data-to-help-fabricate-its-accusation-of-fraud-against-evo-morales/Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
13:5013:50, 23 October 2020diffhist+671
Bolivia
Don't delete real info about David Rosnick again. Not even OAS even dispute his findings that OAS has wrongfully ordered the timestamps in the tally sheets alphabetically rather than chronologically aka a coding error, and hence had flawed data to make their conclusions. https://cepr.net/the-oas-misused-its-own-data-to-help-fabricate-its-accusation-of-fraud-against-evo-morales/Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
13:2313:23, 23 October 2020diffhist+404
Bolivia
Don't delete info about Ethical Hacking's finding. Added ethical hacking info again and their conclusions and source.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
09:0509:05, 23 October 2020diffhist+2,752
Bolivia
→Interim government 2019–present: My last bad edit was simply using Grammarly to correct the previous grammatical mistakes and then click publish but it somehow came out weird and was not on purpose., Yet people are too willing to use it as an excuse to label me a vandal and delete all my edits opportunistically, but I am willing to take this to talk page if anyone wants to argue but just don't censore illegally., Discuss on the talk page, don't delete everything. That;s how wiki should...Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
07:5207:52, 23 October 2020diffhist+33
Bolivia
The subsequent sentences is out of place and has grammatical errors. Transitioned the later sentence to make it tad more smoother.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
07:4607:46, 23 October 2020diffhist+409
Bolivia
It wasn't just domestic civillians asking Morales to leave. The military pr at least the head of the military also took their side in pressuring Morales out and even afterwards, and Anez threatened to prosecute Morales if he returns. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/13/morales-bolivia-military-coupTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
07:1407:14, 23 October 2020diffhist+60
Bolivia
The editor who said that Morales wasn't leading enough in the quick tallly, is actually both spinning and dececing. Firstly it gave the impression that Morales count went up significantrly in the quick tally and then the final tally. That is simply not true at all. The changes were very slight between the quick count and final tally and also Morales had a ten point lead in both counts, I added in the EXACT SPECIFIC Tally counts to give a more accurate and less misleading picture of the talliesTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit