18:0418:04, 9 April 2020diffhist−41
Leftovers
Uh, by who? I've never even heard of this. If personal opinions are going to be at the top of a Wiki article, they should at least have one source.
16:5116:51, 22 January 2020diffhist−48
Neverland Ranch
Saying that there were literally "no clocks" is actually a pretty big statement, and I don't see anything in any of the sources that suggest that would have been true. It seems to be an original inference from the name of the ranch, not a fact about the real ranch itself.
18:0118:01, 16 August 2019diffhist−185
Drone warfare
This statement isn't supported by the only citation used in this section. Who are the officials? Where did they make this statement? It reads as if it is original research, possibly extrapolated from the source, but not directly supported by it. If anyone wants to add this back, please do so with a more affirmative source.
13:2513:25, 11 July 2019diffhist−150
Culling
→Culling and ethics: This is an incredible claim to make without any sourcing. The article included did not even relate to the claim. This is purely original research.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
13:2213:22, 11 July 2019diffhist−16
Culling
→Culling and ethics: There is nothing in Panksepp's own article nor sourced with this statement that accredits him as a "leading neuroscientist" when compared to other American neuroscientists. Wording changed to remove what appears to be an original opinion of the editor and a biasing against the neutrality of the article.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
13:2013:20, 11 July 2019diffhist−18
Culling
→Culling and ethics: The entire article has already explained what culling means. This redundancy is only for the same of removing the neutrality from the text.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
18:0418:04, 9 April 2020diffhist−41
Leftovers
Uh, by who? I've never even heard of this. If personal opinions are going to be at the top of a Wiki article, they should at least have one source.
16:5116:51, 22 January 2020diffhist−48
Neverland Ranch
Saying that there were literally "no clocks" is actually a pretty big statement, and I don't see anything in any of the sources that suggest that would have been true. It seems to be an original inference from the name of the ranch, not a fact about the real ranch itself.
18:0118:01, 16 August 2019diffhist−185
Drone warfare
This statement isn't supported by the only citation used in this section. Who are the officials? Where did they make this statement? It reads as if it is original research, possibly extrapolated from the source, but not directly supported by it. If anyone wants to add this back, please do so with a more affirmative source.
13:2513:25, 11 July 2019diffhist−150
Culling
→Culling and ethics: This is an incredible claim to make without any sourcing. The article included did not even relate to the claim. This is purely original research.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
13:2213:22, 11 July 2019diffhist−16
Culling
→Culling and ethics: There is nothing in Panksepp's own article nor sourced with this statement that accredits him as a "leading neuroscientist" when compared to other American neuroscientists. Wording changed to remove what appears to be an original opinion of the editor and a biasing against the neutrality of the article.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
13:2013:20, 11 July 2019diffhist−18
Culling
→Culling and ethics: The entire article has already explained what culling means. This redundancy is only for the same of removing the neutrality from the text.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit