For 47.28.179.232 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

9 April 2020

23 February 2020

22 January 2020

  • 16:51 16:51, 22 January 2020 diff hist −48 Neverland RanchSaying that there were literally "no clocks" is actually a pretty big statement, and I don't see anything in any of the sources that suggest that would have been true. It seems to be an original inference from the name of the ranch, not a fact about the real ranch itself.

13 November 2019

5 November 2019

22 October 2019

15 September 2019

7 September 2019

29 August 2019

16 August 2019

  • 18:01 18:01, 16 August 2019 diff hist −185 Drone warfareThis statement isn't supported by the only citation used in this section. Who are the officials? Where did they make this statement? It reads as if it is original research, possibly extrapolated from the source, but not directly supported by it. If anyone wants to add this back, please do so with a more affirmative source.

1 August 2019

11 July 2019

  • 13:25 13:25, 11 July 2019 diff hist −150 Culling →‎Culling and ethics: This is an incredible claim to make without any sourcing. The article included did not even relate to the claim. This is purely original research. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:22 13:22, 11 July 2019 diff hist −16 Culling →‎Culling and ethics: There is nothing in Panksepp's own article nor sourced with this statement that accredits him as a "leading neuroscientist" when compared to other American neuroscientists. Wording changed to remove what appears to be an original opinion of the editor and a biasing against the neutrality of the article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:20 13:20, 11 July 2019 diff hist −18 Culling →‎Culling and ethics: The entire article has already explained what culling means. This redundancy is only for the same of removing the neutrality from the text. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 June 2019

For 47.28.179.232 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

9 April 2020

23 February 2020

22 January 2020

  • 16:51 16:51, 22 January 2020 diff hist −48 Neverland RanchSaying that there were literally "no clocks" is actually a pretty big statement, and I don't see anything in any of the sources that suggest that would have been true. It seems to be an original inference from the name of the ranch, not a fact about the real ranch itself.

13 November 2019

5 November 2019

22 October 2019

15 September 2019

7 September 2019

29 August 2019

16 August 2019

  • 18:01 18:01, 16 August 2019 diff hist −185 Drone warfareThis statement isn't supported by the only citation used in this section. Who are the officials? Where did they make this statement? It reads as if it is original research, possibly extrapolated from the source, but not directly supported by it. If anyone wants to add this back, please do so with a more affirmative source.

1 August 2019

11 July 2019

  • 13:25 13:25, 11 July 2019 diff hist −150 Culling →‎Culling and ethics: This is an incredible claim to make without any sourcing. The article included did not even relate to the claim. This is purely original research. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:22 13:22, 11 July 2019 diff hist −16 Culling →‎Culling and ethics: There is nothing in Panksepp's own article nor sourced with this statement that accredits him as a "leading neuroscientist" when compared to other American neuroscientists. Wording changed to remove what appears to be an original opinion of the editor and a biasing against the neutrality of the article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:20 13:20, 11 July 2019 diff hist −18 Culling →‎Culling and ethics: The entire article has already explained what culling means. This redundancy is only for the same of removing the neutrality from the text. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 June 2019


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook