21:4321:43, 3 December 2017diffhist−425
K. K. Aggarwal
WP:BLPSPS makes no exceptions for experts. Per
WP:SPS, "NEVER use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer."Tags: references removedVisual edit
21:3921:39, 3 December 2017diffhist−877
Steve Wheeler
WP:BLPSPS makes no exceptions for experts. Per
WP:SPS, "NEVER use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer."Tags: section blankingVisual edit
21:3221:32, 3 December 2017diffhist−1
Aging (journal)
Previous removed sentence was sourced from a blog post written by an anon author. It was not written by Jeffrey Beall who is the accepted expert on the subject
21:3021:30, 3 December 2017diffhist−621
Aging (journal)
Two problems. 1. This source is an anonymous guest (not RS) and not written by the accepted expert. 2. The source does not accuse Impact Journal of inflating its impact factor. Only accuses editor of inflating his "personal citation index".Tags: references removedVisual edit
00:0400:04, 16 November 2017diffhist−468
Michael Silbermann
Silbermann is never mentioned in sources that coverage of the dog fight between Jeffrey Beall and OMICS. Not mentioned in Science Magazine cited here. Yes, he is on the editorial board of just one of OMICS' Jourlnals. So what? So are a lot of people.Tags: references removedVisual edit
23:4623:46, 15 November 2017diffhist−584
Oncotarget
Two problems. 1. This source is an anonymous guest (not RS) and not written by the accepted expert. 2. The source does not accuse Impact Journal of inflating its impact factor. Only accuses editor of inflating his "personal citation index".Tags: references removedVisual edit
21:4321:43, 3 December 2017diffhist−425
K. K. Aggarwal
WP:BLPSPS makes no exceptions for experts. Per
WP:SPS, "NEVER use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer."Tags: references removedVisual edit
21:3921:39, 3 December 2017diffhist−877
Steve Wheeler
WP:BLPSPS makes no exceptions for experts. Per
WP:SPS, "NEVER use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer."Tags: section blankingVisual edit
21:3221:32, 3 December 2017diffhist−1
Aging (journal)
Previous removed sentence was sourced from a blog post written by an anon author. It was not written by Jeffrey Beall who is the accepted expert on the subject
21:3021:30, 3 December 2017diffhist−621
Aging (journal)
Two problems. 1. This source is an anonymous guest (not RS) and not written by the accepted expert. 2. The source does not accuse Impact Journal of inflating its impact factor. Only accuses editor of inflating his "personal citation index".Tags: references removedVisual edit
00:0400:04, 16 November 2017diffhist−468
Michael Silbermann
Silbermann is never mentioned in sources that coverage of the dog fight between Jeffrey Beall and OMICS. Not mentioned in Science Magazine cited here. Yes, he is on the editorial board of just one of OMICS' Jourlnals. So what? So are a lot of people.Tags: references removedVisual edit
23:4623:46, 15 November 2017diffhist−584
Oncotarget
Two problems. 1. This source is an anonymous guest (not RS) and not written by the accepted expert. 2. The source does not accuse Impact Journal of inflating its impact factor. Only accuses editor of inflating his "personal citation index".Tags: references removedVisual edit