20:5820:58, 3 May 2009diffhist−1,574
Ancient Macedonians
it does "continue to be debated" (in a sense), do we really need a citation for that? remove the "most scholars" think this or that statement, the talk pagehas seen enough bad arguments because of it.
20:5620:56, 3 May 2009diffhist−381
Ancient Macedonians
rv HXs 2nd ed as well. see, the connection you make here might be correct (it has probably been suggested) but it's still your connection (Borza, in this particular paper doesn't argue it) and so, OR.
20:4920:49, 3 May 2009diffhist+36
Ancient Macedonians
rv anon, this is Hall's cited opinion. if you feel this point is so important, I could add a source that disagrees with Hall later but there's no need to miscite.
19:0119:01, 29 April 2009diffhist+1
Macedonia naming dispute
is that infobox map supposed to represent M. at the end of Alexander I's reign? a good part of chalcidice shouldn't be included, the northeast looks a bit weird.
18:5718:57, 29 April 2009diffhist−108
Macedonia naming dispute
ditto (this one isn't even correct or NPOV worded). add a clean-up tag to article, seems that it's sorely needed. I doubt such articles will ever get "it" right.
18:5518:55, 29 April 2009diffhist−421
Macedonia naming dispute
these are not relevant here. the sections describe some (supposedly official or widely-held) arguments forwarded by both sides, not what scholars think (they think that history and politics don't mix)
06:2206:22, 8 April 2009diffhist+19
Varieties of Modern Greek
well, wait a second, the wording here isn't very clear. Brixhe states that it's a Laconian variant of the Attic Koine, not a Laconian Koin''a'' that was influenced by Attic.
20:5820:58, 3 May 2009diffhist−1,574
Ancient Macedonians
it does "continue to be debated" (in a sense), do we really need a citation for that? remove the "most scholars" think this or that statement, the talk pagehas seen enough bad arguments because of it.
20:5620:56, 3 May 2009diffhist−381
Ancient Macedonians
rv HXs 2nd ed as well. see, the connection you make here might be correct (it has probably been suggested) but it's still your connection (Borza, in this particular paper doesn't argue it) and so, OR.
20:4920:49, 3 May 2009diffhist+36
Ancient Macedonians
rv anon, this is Hall's cited opinion. if you feel this point is so important, I could add a source that disagrees with Hall later but there's no need to miscite.
19:0119:01, 29 April 2009diffhist+1
Macedonia naming dispute
is that infobox map supposed to represent M. at the end of Alexander I's reign? a good part of chalcidice shouldn't be included, the northeast looks a bit weird.
18:5718:57, 29 April 2009diffhist−108
Macedonia naming dispute
ditto (this one isn't even correct or NPOV worded). add a clean-up tag to article, seems that it's sorely needed. I doubt such articles will ever get "it" right.
18:5518:55, 29 April 2009diffhist−421
Macedonia naming dispute
these are not relevant here. the sections describe some (supposedly official or widely-held) arguments forwarded by both sides, not what scholars think (they think that history and politics don't mix)
06:2206:22, 8 April 2009diffhist+19
Varieties of Modern Greek
well, wait a second, the wording here isn't very clear. Brixhe states that it's a Laconian variant of the Attic Koine, not a Laconian Koin''a'' that was influenced by Attic.