21:2221:22, 14 November 2021diffhist+248
Cyclura ricordii
→Common names: So confusing... although this may have been first published in the newsletter, this is frankly unclear. The text of this website 'action plan' is identical to this 2000 book in this case, best cite it to this work.
18:3318:33, 14 November 2021diffhist+3
Cyclura ricordii
→Common names: date was wrong -these documents were originally published in the Iguana Specialist Group newsletter, this one apparently in 1997 or later, and then republished in 2000 in book form as an 'action plan', and then republished without dates on the website around 2002 or earlier
16:3116:31, 14 November 2021diffhist+2,761
Cyclura nubila
→Taxonomy: Brilliant, another completely different taxonomic interpretation; corr. myself in geo.; F'ing heck, I'm referring to the same book twice here.. wrong book? or am I confused? ... checking... yup, this is wrong... correcting... frigging have to completely rewrite everything
21:2221:22, 14 November 2021diffhist+248
Cyclura ricordii
→Common names: So confusing... although this may have been first published in the newsletter, this is frankly unclear. The text of this website 'action plan' is identical to this 2000 book in this case, best cite it to this work.
18:3318:33, 14 November 2021diffhist+3
Cyclura ricordii
→Common names: date was wrong -these documents were originally published in the Iguana Specialist Group newsletter, this one apparently in 1997 or later, and then republished in 2000 in book form as an 'action plan', and then republished without dates on the website around 2002 or earlier
16:3116:31, 14 November 2021diffhist+2,761
Cyclura nubila
→Taxonomy: Brilliant, another completely different taxonomic interpretation; corr. myself in geo.; F'ing heck, I'm referring to the same book twice here.. wrong book? or am I confused? ... checking... yup, this is wrong... correcting... frigging have to completely rewrite everything