13:4213:42, 1 March 2022diffhist−948
Million Dollar Extreme
→World Peace: Libel is illegal, it would be wise to stop allowing it. An opinion piece (op-ed) does NOT constitute as evidence to section in question, all opinions therein were of a sole individual and are therefore subjective. Hence why I am removing the section. If you can refute this with actual evidence then let me know and we can discuss. Otherwise stop allowing it immediately.Tags: Revertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
13:4113:41, 1 March 2022diffhist−209
Million Dollar Extreme
Libel is illegal, it would be wise to stop allowing it. An opinion piece (op-ed) does NOT constitute as evidence to section in question, all opinions therein were of a sole individual and are therefore subjective. Hence why I am removing the section. If you can refute this with actual evidence then let me know and we can discuss. Otherwise stop allowing it immediately.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
13:3913:39, 1 March 2022diffhist−948
Million Dollar Extreme
→World Peace: Libel is illegal, it would be wise to stop allowing it. An opinion piece (op-ed) does NOT constitute as evidence to section in question, all opinions therein were of a sole individual and are therefore subjective. Hence why I am removing the section. If you can refute this with actual evidence then let me know and we can discuss. Otherwise stop allowing it immediately.Tags: Manual revertRevertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
13:3713:37, 1 March 2022diffhist−210
Million Dollar Extreme
Libel is illegal, it would be wise to stop allowing it. An opinion piece (op-ed) does NOT constitute as evidence to section in question, all opinions therein were of a sole individual and are therefore subjective. Hence why I am removing the section. If you can refute this with actual evidence then let me know and we can discuss. Otherwise stop allowing it immediately.Tags: Manual revertRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
12:5512:55, 1 March 2022diffhist−948
Million Dollar Extreme
→World Peace: Fixed, some buzzfeed op-ed is not a valid “reference” that will substantiate the defamatory claims previously made. It is an opinion. There is no proof for Sam Hyde being directly affiliated with ANY political group. Every time somebody adds this in I will remove it. If my IP gets banned, I will change it and remove it.Tags: Revertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
13:4213:42, 1 March 2022diffhist−948
Million Dollar Extreme
→World Peace: Libel is illegal, it would be wise to stop allowing it. An opinion piece (op-ed) does NOT constitute as evidence to section in question, all opinions therein were of a sole individual and are therefore subjective. Hence why I am removing the section. If you can refute this with actual evidence then let me know and we can discuss. Otherwise stop allowing it immediately.Tags: Revertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
13:4113:41, 1 March 2022diffhist−209
Million Dollar Extreme
Libel is illegal, it would be wise to stop allowing it. An opinion piece (op-ed) does NOT constitute as evidence to section in question, all opinions therein were of a sole individual and are therefore subjective. Hence why I am removing the section. If you can refute this with actual evidence then let me know and we can discuss. Otherwise stop allowing it immediately.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
13:3913:39, 1 March 2022diffhist−948
Million Dollar Extreme
→World Peace: Libel is illegal, it would be wise to stop allowing it. An opinion piece (op-ed) does NOT constitute as evidence to section in question, all opinions therein were of a sole individual and are therefore subjective. Hence why I am removing the section. If you can refute this with actual evidence then let me know and we can discuss. Otherwise stop allowing it immediately.Tags: Manual revertRevertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
13:3713:37, 1 March 2022diffhist−210
Million Dollar Extreme
Libel is illegal, it would be wise to stop allowing it. An opinion piece (op-ed) does NOT constitute as evidence to section in question, all opinions therein were of a sole individual and are therefore subjective. Hence why I am removing the section. If you can refute this with actual evidence then let me know and we can discuss. Otherwise stop allowing it immediately.Tags: Manual revertRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
12:5512:55, 1 March 2022diffhist−948
Million Dollar Extreme
→World Peace: Fixed, some buzzfeed op-ed is not a valid “reference” that will substantiate the defamatory claims previously made. It is an opinion. There is no proof for Sam Hyde being directly affiliated with ANY political group. Every time somebody adds this in I will remove it. If my IP gets banned, I will change it and remove it.Tags: Revertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit