For 2603:9000:9006:7A97:8104:58C7:E201:96BC
talk
block log
logs
filter log
17 September 2019
- 00:24 00:24, 17 September 2019 diff hist 0 Talk:Debits and credits →"For simplicity it is often best to view Debits as positive numbers and Credits as negative numbers."
- 00:24 00:24, 17 September 2019 diff hist +338 Talk:Debits and credits →"For simplicity it is often best to view Debits as positive numbers and Credits as negative numbers.": new section
- 00:13 00:13, 17 September 2019 diff hist +1,289 Talk:Double-entry bookkeeping →Books of Accounts: ambiguous to wrong: new section
16 September 2019
- 23:47 23:47, 16 September 2019 diff hist +1 Double-entry bookkeeping →Accounting equation approach
- 23:46 23:46, 16 September 2019 diff hist −6 Double-entry bookkeeping →Accounting equation approach: The list of 5 account types in the text does not match the list of 5 account types in the vertical listing. I made them match. That's an improvement, but I think it still needs work.
- 23:40 23:40, 16 September 2019 diff hist +12 Double-entry bookkeeping →Accounting entries: "results in total debits being equal to total credits for all accounts in the general ledger." Worded poorly. All accounts do not have equal total debits and equal total credits.
- 23:35 23:35, 16 September 2019 diff hist +98 Double-entry bookkeeping I replace the disaster that was the bulk of the first paragraph, with something that is correct.
 | This is the
contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
For 2603:9000:9006:7A97:8104:58C7:E201:96BC
talk
block log
logs
filter log
17 September 2019
- 00:24 00:24, 17 September 2019 diff hist 0 Talk:Debits and credits →"For simplicity it is often best to view Debits as positive numbers and Credits as negative numbers."
- 00:24 00:24, 17 September 2019 diff hist +338 Talk:Debits and credits →"For simplicity it is often best to view Debits as positive numbers and Credits as negative numbers.": new section
- 00:13 00:13, 17 September 2019 diff hist +1,289 Talk:Double-entry bookkeeping →Books of Accounts: ambiguous to wrong: new section
16 September 2019
- 23:47 23:47, 16 September 2019 diff hist +1 Double-entry bookkeeping →Accounting equation approach
- 23:46 23:46, 16 September 2019 diff hist −6 Double-entry bookkeeping →Accounting equation approach: The list of 5 account types in the text does not match the list of 5 account types in the vertical listing. I made them match. That's an improvement, but I think it still needs work.
- 23:40 23:40, 16 September 2019 diff hist +12 Double-entry bookkeeping →Accounting entries: "results in total debits being equal to total credits for all accounts in the general ledger." Worded poorly. All accounts do not have equal total debits and equal total credits.
- 23:35 23:35, 16 September 2019 diff hist +98 Double-entry bookkeeping I replace the disaster that was the bulk of the first paragraph, with something that is correct.
|
| This is the
contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |