For 2602:252:D0C:B9F0:DDCF:C12D:B856:2E3D talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

31 March 2016

  • 19:51 19:51, 31 March 2016 diff hist +248 John C. McAdamsUndid revision 712905458 Even without the blog, reference 10 backs that the Grad Instructor prevented the student from voicing his arguments in class. Why is this detail continually being removed when its important to McAdams rationale. Blatant censorship
  • 19:39 19:39, 31 March 2016 diff hist +490 John C. McAdamsUndidrevision712904412 They are when are you are describing a person's argument. These were his words, no different than using a press release to outline Marquette's argument. You are going from one excuse to another. Contribs sent me a COI note.
  • 19:31 19:31, 31 March 2016 diff hist +490 John C. McAdamsUndid revision 712902127 by Gamaliel ( talk) many of the details are in reference 10. His blog is the Marquette Warrior. http://mu-warrior.blogspot.in/2014/11/marquette-philosophy-instructor-gay.htm
  • 19:13 19:13, 31 March 2016 diff hist +400 John C. McAdamsHe outlines his position very clearly throughout his whole blog. Details are being selectively ignored to slant the article towards Marquette. Personally, I support gay marriage, however several contributors are actively removing detail to impart bias.
  • 18:32 18:32, 31 March 2016 diff hist +400 John C. McAdamsUndid revision 712892804 by Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz ( talk) Will you please read reference 10, I've been same IP. Assumptions are logic fallacies.
  • 17:35 17:35, 31 March 2016 diff hist +400 John C. McAdamsUndid revision 712882168 by Gamaliel ( talk) Material is in reference 10
  • 16:46 16:46, 31 March 2016 diff hist +400 John C. McAdamsFurther context and detail added. Initial description of McAdams' suspension was content poor and only provided Marquette's side of the incident

12 September 2015

For 2602:252:D0C:B9F0:DDCF:C12D:B856:2E3D talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

31 March 2016

  • 19:51 19:51, 31 March 2016 diff hist +248 John C. McAdamsUndid revision 712905458 Even without the blog, reference 10 backs that the Grad Instructor prevented the student from voicing his arguments in class. Why is this detail continually being removed when its important to McAdams rationale. Blatant censorship
  • 19:39 19:39, 31 March 2016 diff hist +490 John C. McAdamsUndidrevision712904412 They are when are you are describing a person's argument. These were his words, no different than using a press release to outline Marquette's argument. You are going from one excuse to another. Contribs sent me a COI note.
  • 19:31 19:31, 31 March 2016 diff hist +490 John C. McAdamsUndid revision 712902127 by Gamaliel ( talk) many of the details are in reference 10. His blog is the Marquette Warrior. http://mu-warrior.blogspot.in/2014/11/marquette-philosophy-instructor-gay.htm
  • 19:13 19:13, 31 March 2016 diff hist +400 John C. McAdamsHe outlines his position very clearly throughout his whole blog. Details are being selectively ignored to slant the article towards Marquette. Personally, I support gay marriage, however several contributors are actively removing detail to impart bias.
  • 18:32 18:32, 31 March 2016 diff hist +400 John C. McAdamsUndid revision 712892804 by Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz ( talk) Will you please read reference 10, I've been same IP. Assumptions are logic fallacies.
  • 17:35 17:35, 31 March 2016 diff hist +400 John C. McAdamsUndid revision 712882168 by Gamaliel ( talk) Material is in reference 10
  • 16:46 16:46, 31 March 2016 diff hist +400 John C. McAdamsFurther context and detail added. Initial description of McAdams' suspension was content poor and only provided Marquette's side of the incident

12 September 2015


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook