03:3003:30, 30 December 2015diffhist+13
EBay
You weren't considering YOUR reversions to this form as "disruptive editing" before, so it's not "disruptive" now. Besides, why are you putting "current" back if one of your favored editors already removed it?
02:5502:55, 30 December 2015diffhist+21
EBay
WE (I'm mobile and explicitly saying so) did not arrive at this consensus. You did that without me. This is the compromise we already had when all those reversions were happening by escape orbit and 2602.... It doesn't need to get more strict than this.
03:3003:30, 30 December 2015diffhist+13
EBay
You weren't considering YOUR reversions to this form as "disruptive editing" before, so it's not "disruptive" now. Besides, why are you putting "current" back if one of your favored editors already removed it?
02:5502:55, 30 December 2015diffhist+21
EBay
WE (I'm mobile and explicitly saying so) did not arrive at this consensus. You did that without me. This is the compromise we already had when all those reversions were happening by escape orbit and 2602.... It doesn't need to get more strict than this.