23:0523:05, 15 April 2015diffhist−372
Go (programming language)
→Language design: move the details of explicit conversions from the high-level summary to the types section -- if we were to explain about int conversions etc. up top it'd need to be shorter, so the summary stays a summary
20:1720:17, 8 January 2015diffhist+532
Go (programming language)
→Types: rather than say "strings are for text", define strings technically--"like a byte slice, but...". little verbose but covers most of it from the spec's POV--also add refs
23:0523:05, 15 April 2015diffhist−372
Go (programming language)
→Language design: move the details of explicit conversions from the high-level summary to the types section -- if we were to explain about int conversions etc. up top it'd need to be shorter, so the summary stays a summary
20:1720:17, 8 January 2015diffhist+532
Go (programming language)
→Types: rather than say "strings are for text", define strings technically--"like a byte slice, but...". little verbose but covers most of it from the spec's POV--also add refs