25 February 2024

• 23:23 23:23, 25 February 2024 diff hist +694‎ User talk:Obenritter ‎ →‎As a...: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
• 23:12 23:12, 25 February 2024 diff hist +928‎ Talk:Rabies ‎ →‎Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2024: new section
• 23:04 23:04, 25 February 2024 diff hist +775‎ Talk:Rabies ‎ →‎Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2024: new section
• 22:52 22:52, 25 February 2024 diff hist +3,465‎ User talk:Jpgordon ‎ →‎Please check on these challenges with Wikimedia Commons legal: new section Tag: New topic

20 February 2024

• 14:27 14:27, 20 February 2024 diff hist +1,480‎ Ananias and Sapphira ‎ →‎Modern scholarship: Fixed various citations, using {{cite... markup. Added dates to sources when possible, and made author formats consistent (Last, First), removed the descriptor "Calvinist "about the French pastor (because that information is not in the source, and so WP:OR). Otherwise broke up that quote, for sake of flow. Suggest its shortening, by removing material that is not relevant to the current article.

19 February 2024

• 01:24 01:24, 19 February 2024 diff hist +25‎ War elephant ‎ →‎Description: Either the earlier 2022 editor missed a sentence, or someone has decided to ignore the instructive appearance of the {{citation needed... tags, to continue adding unsourced sentences. We're presuming the latter, and adding one more (identical) tag.

18 February 2024

• 16:43 16:43, 18 February 2024 diff hist +11‎ Tom Matlack ‎ Noting article is in need of an update., as its focus is on events of a decade ago.
• 16:36 16:36, 18 February 2024 diff hist +13‎ Tom Matlack ‎ →‎Career: Annotating a dead link.
• 07:06 07:06, 18 February 2024 diff hist +72‎ National Assessment of Educational Progress ‎ →‎High School Transcript Study (HSTS): Citing an organizational website, and then stating personal knowledge on a subject does not seem to meet the WP:VERIFY standard of encyclopedic writing. current

13 February 2024

• 16:01 16:01, 13 February 2024 diff hist 0‎ Anne Baranger ‎ →‎Selected publications: Made author presentation title case, consistent with rest of sources in article.
• 15:57 15:57, 13 February 2024 diff hist −25‎ Anne Baranger ‎ →‎Career: Corrected titles and URLs in the two UIUC citations, so each properly directs and supports content.
• 15:51 15:51, 13 February 2024 diff hist +18‎ Anne Baranger ‎ Made date appearances uniform across the article, with {{use... dates}} markup.
• 15:48 15:48, 13 February 2024 diff hist +1,792‎ Anne Baranger ‎ Creating a Further reading section—for independent, third-party citations either underused, or not used at all in the current article. Corrected the impression that Baranger's research was only on Chem Education. Addressed the fact that the News Gazette source does not support the content of the sentence to which it is attached. Removed a redundant appearance of a citation to her Berkeley faculty page, and completed/corrected the UC-Berkeley report of her being named dean.
• 14:59 14:59, 13 February 2024 diff hist +514‎ Anne Baranger ‎ →‎Early life and education: Repaired broken dead link and completed that citation (with author, date). Noted citing an apparent graduate dissertation page at Google books (snapshot view only), cannot support advisor name. Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
• 14:40 14:40, 13 February 2024 diff hist +48‎ Anne Baranger ‎ →‎Research and career: Noting autobiographical and primary source misuse. Removed "hopes" and "interest" language. (Citing only author self-description, and citing a pair of primary research publications—to state their personal hope—is WP:OR and not encyclopedic writing. Need to otherwise source such information..
• 14:25 14:25, 13 February 2024 diff hist −3‎ Anne Baranger ‎ →‎Research and career: Correction. (UIUC is not in Chicago.)

7 February 2024

• 21:28 21:28, 7 February 2024 diff hist +246‎ User talk:Filmgoer ‎ →‎Perhaps you could...: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
• 21:22 21:22, 7 February 2024 diff hist +407‎ Asteroid City ‎ Someone misunderstanding WP subsection headings created a subsection title using <big>... markup syntax, and this stylistic markup issue was addressed. Same editor apparently misunderstands citation practice, inserted a URL into text rather than properly added inline citation (that too corrected). Finally, they added 3 sentences of WP:OR, giving personal interpretation of movie. These 3 sentences were tagged; a better, bolder edit would be to delete them, and to add an {{expand section... tag. Tag: nowiki added

5 February 2024

• 18:26 18:26, 5 February 2024 diff hist +4‎ Linda Avey ‎ Added 1 wikilink, skimmed earlier ref. edits for typos, etc. Again, NOTE, contrary to bot-placed flag in edit summary, no BLP ref's removed. Refs were completed, checked (cf.). Ones not supporting sentences to which attached--erroneously placed inline cit's--were moved to new Further reading or External links sections, as appropriate. Citations in InfoBox were moved to main body, to ensure content there was sourced. Rampant sentence-end multi-citations are now fewer, only bec. some were invalid.
• 18:14 18:14, 5 February 2024 diff hist +1,798‎ Linda Avey ‎ NOTE: No sources removed, only moved to proper positions. Revitalised Bio-ITWorld.com link. Returned BA in biology content, bec. it appears in BigThink self-publication, but better source is needed. Moved Precise.ly and Augustana citations from InfoBox into main body; it is presumed that infobox summarised main body content is sourced. Otherwise, checked, edited sources; moved several into Further reading (did not support sentences they followed), and hid Avey LinkedIn autobio as poor source. Tags: possible unreferenced addition to BLP references removed
• 16:33 16:33, 5 February 2024 diff hist +444‎ Linda Avey ‎ Moved the useful Forbes citation to further reading, from a point, hidden in the text (because it did not in fact support the sentence to which it was attached). Tags: possible unreferenced addition to BLP references removed
• 16:22 16:22, 5 February 2024 diff hist +2,574‎ Linda Avey ‎ →‎Early career: Addressed plagiarism from BigThink.com (placed cribbed material in quotes, added citation to actual source of sentence content). Current section sourcing is otherwise obfuscatory; no earlier placed citation supported sentence to which it was attached. Earlier citations seem aimed to make content appear verifiable, when it was not. Employment citations only established company existence, not Avery employ. Forbes citation supported nothing.
• 15:32 15:32, 5 February 2024 diff hist +116‎ Big Think ‎ →‎History: Seemingly pretty well done sourcing here, except last sentence. Citation and copy edits: Completed the Forbes citation (date missing). CEs: 2000+ is not good encyclopedic prose, and there was a better way to communicate that the designation of expert is internal to the company, rather than generally recognized.
• 14:41 14:41, 5 February 2024 diff hist +920‎ Linda Avey ‎ Corrected the Forbes article authorship and the Augustana alumni award citation content. Noted that lead sources appearing fail to establish Avey is Bahnson, and that this fact is also not yet adequately supported within the main body of the text, in violation of WP:INTRO and WP:VERIFY.