04:2704:27, 29 July 2012diffhist−288
Race and intelligence
WP:Leadcite is not a red link. The statement starts out as meaningless and finishes up as wrong. Meat puppets are using 3RR to keep garbage in articles contrary to explicit policy
02:5802:58, 28 July 2012diffhist−288
Race and intelligence
Unreferenced statements. The first part is true - but irrelevant (no universal definitions) the second part is likely false but also irrelevant. In any case
wp:burden.
13:0413:04, 15 October 2011diffhist−3
Migration Period
Trying to remove minority language usage i.e. "common era" etc for more widespread and accurate terms. Why not rename the days of the week to remove religious origins and obscure what you are talking about?
11:0811:08, 22 July 2011diffhist+15,294
Race and crime
No evidence of consensus to "stubify" which really means "no consensus to delete". Wikipedia isn't a democracy, and there's no mandate to delete, and that's plain loopy.
09:0509:05, 21 July 2011diffhist+15,294
Race and crime
Transperent attempt to censor article - reintroducing information. Be DISCRIMINATING in what information is removed not BIASED
20:1820:18, 31 March 2011diffhist−1,896
Passive smoking
→Controversy over harm: Unreferenced ad hom section. The references don't support the opinions expressed in the paragraph. Find some real controversial studies about second hand smoke. Is it worse than candle smoke?Tag: section blanking
03:1003:10, 12 December 2010diffhist−2,537
Anglo-Celtic Australians
Deleting data shown to be unreliable (by academic sources) after discussion. Burden of proof on editors who wish to reinsert to show data is reliable with references and consensus on talk.
04:2704:27, 29 July 2012diffhist−288
Race and intelligence
WP:Leadcite is not a red link. The statement starts out as meaningless and finishes up as wrong. Meat puppets are using 3RR to keep garbage in articles contrary to explicit policy
02:5802:58, 28 July 2012diffhist−288
Race and intelligence
Unreferenced statements. The first part is true - but irrelevant (no universal definitions) the second part is likely false but also irrelevant. In any case
wp:burden.
13:0413:04, 15 October 2011diffhist−3
Migration Period
Trying to remove minority language usage i.e. "common era" etc for more widespread and accurate terms. Why not rename the days of the week to remove religious origins and obscure what you are talking about?
11:0811:08, 22 July 2011diffhist+15,294
Race and crime
No evidence of consensus to "stubify" which really means "no consensus to delete". Wikipedia isn't a democracy, and there's no mandate to delete, and that's plain loopy.
09:0509:05, 21 July 2011diffhist+15,294
Race and crime
Transperent attempt to censor article - reintroducing information. Be DISCRIMINATING in what information is removed not BIASED
20:1820:18, 31 March 2011diffhist−1,896
Passive smoking
→Controversy over harm: Unreferenced ad hom section. The references don't support the opinions expressed in the paragraph. Find some real controversial studies about second hand smoke. Is it worse than candle smoke?Tag: section blanking
03:1003:10, 12 December 2010diffhist−2,537
Anglo-Celtic Australians
Deleting data shown to be unreliable (by academic sources) after discussion. Burden of proof on editors who wish to reinsert to show data is reliable with references and consensus on talk.