17 September 2018

• 00:20 00:20, 17 September 2018 diff hist +39‎ Stetsbar ‎ →‎Principle of operation

21 August 2018

• 01:19 01:19, 21 August 2018 diff hist −200‎ Nickel silver ‎ a yahoo group forum message to supposedly justify that german silver had been called electrum in the past...is not a valid reference Tag: references removed
• 01:14 01:14, 21 August 2018 diff hist −325‎ Electrum ‎ a yahoo group forum message is NOT a valid wikipedia ref to supposedly validate that "electrum was a term used to call german silver"

2 July 2018

• 02:27 02:27, 2 July 2018 diff hist +126‎ Bêlit ‎ →‎Fiction

26 June 2018

• 03:41 03:41, 26 June 2018 diff hist +289‎ Talk:Oak (wine) ‎ →‎European "Acacia" is not true Acacia, but Black Locust (Robinia Pseudoacacia)
• 03:24 03:24, 26 June 2018 diff hist +2,063‎ Talk:Oak (wine) ‎No edit summary
• 02:30 02:30, 26 June 2018 diff hist +18‎ Oak (wine) ‎ →‎Other wood types: Black Locust (robinia pseudoacacia) is called properly "Robinier" in French or more commonly "faux acacia" or improperly "acacia" due to its scientific name "robinia pseudoacacia" , due to the fact that it mimics partially the visual aspect of the true acacia genus .

4 June 2018

• 04:41 04:41, 4 June 2018 diff hist +422‎ List of haplogroups of historic people ‎ →‎Mary Magdalene

30 April 2018

• 01:11 01:11, 30 April 2018 diff hist +23‎ Shoulder rest ‎ →‎Merits and Demerits: redundancies corrected
• 01:07 01:07, 30 April 2018 diff hist −14‎ Shoulder rest ‎ →‎Merits and Demerits: rephrased for clarity.

20 March 2018

• 00:31 00:31, 20 March 2018 diff hist +2,629‎ User talk:212.195.123.143 ‎No edit summary current

19 March 2018

• 13:25 13:25, 19 March 2018 diff hist +1,859‎ User talk:212.195.123.143 ‎No edit summary
• 04:43 04:43, 19 March 2018 diff hist +78‎ User talk:212.195.123.143 ‎No edit summary
• 04:39 04:39, 19 March 2018 diff hist +3,113‎ User talk:212.195.123.143 ‎No edit summary
• 03:33 03:33, 19 March 2018 diff hist 0‎ User talk:212.195.123.143 ‎ →‎March 2018
• 03:32 03:32, 19 March 2018 diff hist +1‎ User talk:212.195.123.143 ‎ →‎March 2018
• 03:31 03:31, 19 March 2018 diff hist +1,804‎ User talk:212.195.123.143 ‎ →‎March 2018
• 03:10 03:10, 19 March 2018 diff hist +1‎ User talk:212.195.123.143 ‎ →‎March 2018
• 03:09 03:09, 19 March 2018 diff hist +1,161‎ User talk:212.195.123.143 ‎ →‎March 2018
• 02:56 02:56, 19 March 2018 diff hist −352‎ Jōmon period ‎ →‎Genetics: osteological review on Kennewick Man is outdated (see wikipedia article on Kennewick Man) and mentions only morphological similarities , not genetic , so it should be simply not referenced in the article since modern DNA testing on Ainu and ancient Jomon show their affinity to Haplogroup D-M55 originating from Central Asia (see wikipedia article) Tag: references removed
• 02:24 02:24, 19 March 2018 diff hist +1,426‎ User talk:212.195.123.143 ‎ →‎March 2018
• 02:03 02:03, 19 March 2018 diff hist −2‎ Jōmon period ‎ →‎Genetics
• 02:02 02:02, 19 March 2018 diff hist +429‎ Jōmon period ‎ →‎Genetics: OSTEOLOGICAL study says LITERALLY, quote: "Kennewick appears to have strongest morphological affinities with populations in Polynesia and southern Asia, and not with American Indians". DNA tests from 2013-2015 show this assertion to be incorrect, see DNA tests results here /info/en/?search=Kennewick_Man#DNA
• 01:34 01:34, 19 March 2018 diff hist +165‎ Jōmon period ‎ →‎Genetics: Read the paper in question instead of posting PERSONAL OPINIONS. It is an OSTEOLOGICAL study of Kennewick man (and other populations in comparison, using data obtained through CRANIOMETRY, NOT GENETICS) there is ZERO genetic testing in the paper, it is not even mentioned once, so you cannot say "genetic relationship" . The paper mentions a "BIOLOGICAL affinity" between Ainu/Jomon and southeast asians. Worse, all the 2013-2015 DNA tests on Kennewick Man's remains contradict the outdated conclusions or rather "suggestions" of said paper .
• 00:58 00:58, 19 March 2018 diff hist +105‎ D3O ‎No edit summary
• 00:46 00:46, 19 March 2018 diff hist +352‎ D3O ‎ inital wiki article is misleading, there are no "trace amounts" of PBDMS, the proportion is much more important according to the patent, see ref.

18 March 2018

• 00:18 00:18, 18 March 2018 diff hist +18‎ Cherchen Man ‎No edit summary

25 February 2018

• 01:51 01:51, 25 February 2018 diff hist +208‎ Cubic zirconia ‎ →‎Innovations

25 January 2018

• 14:43 14:43, 25 January 2018 diff hist +525‎ Jōmon period ‎ →‎Genetics: the osteological study in question is vastly outdated , see refs & links concerning aDNA analysis in the Kennewick Man wiki page

11 August 2017

• 18:13 18:13, 11 August 2017 diff hist −103‎ Lacquer ‎ →‎Urushiol-based lacquers: part claiming that burmese lacquer doesn't cause allergic reactions is refuted with valid ref on dedicated page( /info/en/?search=Melanorrhoea_usitata )