07:3507:35, 6 November 2016diffhist−5
Stickum
It's only 'discredited' if you believe it two other people with a vested interest. More accurate to say denied, instead. ~~~~
04:4504:45, 10 September 2016diffhist−14
Nineteen Eighty-Four
→History and title: An opinion in the Guardian is not literary scholarship, nor is Paul Owen an authority of any sort. Resemblances exist and Orwell was aware of the novel, so a mention seems justified but the original sentence was way too strong ~~~~
02:3602:36, 10 September 2016diffhist0
Issaquah (steam ferry)
→California service: She's obviously NOT a paddlewheeler, just look at the photo. Also, I lived 100 yards away from her and remember her fondly but that's personal research. She has propellers, not sidewheels. In fact, that was a drawback ~~~~
02:3002:30, 10 September 2016diffhist+62
Issaquah (steam ferry)
"can be seen" and "visible" are redundant. And she's not at a dock, she's already in the mud. I have a screenshot from the movie but that's copyright, I'm certain. ~~~
12:2112:21, 4 September 2016diffhist+12
John Yoo
Since it was repudiated within two days by the next administration, "attempt" would be a more accurate term. In the eyes of much of the world, NOTHING "legitimized" the actions of the Bush administration ~~~~
12:5112:51, 29 August 2016diffhist−131
R v Perka
→Raid: Incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial. That is not the ONLY conclusion one could draw, therefore it does not belong. For instance, crew claim was they went to calm water to allow sediment to settle out of the fuel. Perhaps that happened ~~~~
09:3309:33, 29 August 2016diffhist−1
Delta King
→Current Duty: too many commas in that sentence, makes it confusing. In fact, my 8th grade English teacher would mark the paper down as a 'run-on sentence' ~~~~
10:2410:24, 10 August 2016diffhist+5
Janis Joplin
Umm, Big Borther was not "unknown" at all. They were huge in San Francisco. So I'll go along to the extent of "little-known" because probably no one knew of them in Omaha ~~~~
07:3507:35, 6 November 2016diffhist−5
Stickum
It's only 'discredited' if you believe it two other people with a vested interest. More accurate to say denied, instead. ~~~~
04:4504:45, 10 September 2016diffhist−14
Nineteen Eighty-Four
→History and title: An opinion in the Guardian is not literary scholarship, nor is Paul Owen an authority of any sort. Resemblances exist and Orwell was aware of the novel, so a mention seems justified but the original sentence was way too strong ~~~~
02:3602:36, 10 September 2016diffhist0
Issaquah (steam ferry)
→California service: She's obviously NOT a paddlewheeler, just look at the photo. Also, I lived 100 yards away from her and remember her fondly but that's personal research. She has propellers, not sidewheels. In fact, that was a drawback ~~~~
02:3002:30, 10 September 2016diffhist+62
Issaquah (steam ferry)
"can be seen" and "visible" are redundant. And she's not at a dock, she's already in the mud. I have a screenshot from the movie but that's copyright, I'm certain. ~~~
12:2112:21, 4 September 2016diffhist+12
John Yoo
Since it was repudiated within two days by the next administration, "attempt" would be a more accurate term. In the eyes of much of the world, NOTHING "legitimized" the actions of the Bush administration ~~~~
12:5112:51, 29 August 2016diffhist−131
R v Perka
→Raid: Incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial. That is not the ONLY conclusion one could draw, therefore it does not belong. For instance, crew claim was they went to calm water to allow sediment to settle out of the fuel. Perhaps that happened ~~~~
09:3309:33, 29 August 2016diffhist−1
Delta King
→Current Duty: too many commas in that sentence, makes it confusing. In fact, my 8th grade English teacher would mark the paper down as a 'run-on sentence' ~~~~
10:2410:24, 10 August 2016diffhist+5
Janis Joplin
Umm, Big Borther was not "unknown" at all. They were huge in San Francisco. So I'll go along to the extent of "little-known" because probably no one knew of them in Omaha ~~~~