15:1515:15, 3 February 2023diffhist−262
Nixon shock
→Event: An opinion piece from one newspaper in one city. Show me again that new York is full of narcissisistamTags: Revertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
15:1215:12, 3 February 2023diffhist−7
Nixon shock
→Event: Cmon. Can we please stop ascribing motive and feelings and morals to public figures. Which psychic told us that nixon cared, at all?Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:1115:11, 3 February 2023diffhist−48
Nixon shock
→Background: Took out irrelevant numbers to highlight relevant numbers.aybe the confusing less relevant numbers could be added farther down in the article.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
14:4814:48, 3 February 2023diffhist+5
Bretton Woods system
It existed for three decades. It didn't "persist" or "succeed", de facto has now "succeeded" longer than Breton woods was ever even functionalTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
1 February 2023
14:5314:53, 1 February 2023diffhist+49
Napoleon and the Jews
Clarified intent behind this law. If this is incorrect information please proceed to correct the page "Grand Sandherin" because that is where this information is pulled fromTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
14:2014:20, 1 February 2023diffhist−426
Infamous Decree
The source cited is obviously not reliable,if this citation IS RELIABLE then about 90% of the Grand Sandherin page needs to be rewritten to match this source.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
14:1614:16, 1 February 2023diffhist−228
Infamous Decree
We don't need to be stretching the truth of citations,on order to reinforce antisemitic stereotypes. Are you fucking Nazis?Tags: Revertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
14:0514:05, 1 February 2023diffhist+72
Napoleon and the Jews
Clarified that this is something Jewish people told Napoleon,not something Napoleon forced on them on any way shape or form.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
13:5713:57, 1 February 2023diffhist−520
Usury
→Judaism: Not sure how a single document,from one city, from 1799 is supposed to show that all Jewish people were ostracized across all of Europe since they year 1300 or so. anti-Semitism" is just a magic word that gets lies published to wikipedia apparently.Tags: Revertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
13:5213:52, 1 February 2023diffhist+168
Usury
→Judaism: Obviously this is very relevant. Does this article deliberately stop in the year 1500 or some such thing?Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
13:4513:45, 1 February 2023diffhist−3
Grand Sanhedrin
→Sessions: Obviously this decree/article has significant to Napoleon,and politicians,but just as clearly it was not for Jewish people,not followed by, not bonding for and not prescriptive for how Jewish people were bound by their religion.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:1515:15, 27 October 2021diffhist+28
Tomahawk
→Composition: Clarified that this is ALL just what ONE person claims. If it wasn't for Mike this entire article would have close to zero referencesTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:1315:13, 27 October 2021diffhist+22
Tomahawk
→Modern use: Whole US army units have ever used the tomahawk. Individuals may. Stop trying to glorify this simple tool for political reasons.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:1015:10, 27 October 2021diffhist−50
Tomahawk
→Composition: These smokable tomahawks exist commercially. So do bright neon ones. Is this article about history or fringe commercial products???Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:0715:07, 27 October 2021diffhist−182
Tomahawk
→Composition: If this was true there would not be several dozen pages in Wikipedia describing metelurgy before European contact. But there is.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:0415:04, 27 October 2021diffhist−15
Axe
→History: The author providing the reference does say they were independently invented. They provide absolutely NO arguments or evidence to support this. The only thing they have evidence for is the axes existing. Archaeology is fraught with bias, especially cultural.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
15:1515:15, 3 February 2023diffhist−262
Nixon shock
→Event: An opinion piece from one newspaper in one city. Show me again that new York is full of narcissisistamTags: Revertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
15:1215:12, 3 February 2023diffhist−7
Nixon shock
→Event: Cmon. Can we please stop ascribing motive and feelings and morals to public figures. Which psychic told us that nixon cared, at all?Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:1115:11, 3 February 2023diffhist−48
Nixon shock
→Background: Took out irrelevant numbers to highlight relevant numbers.aybe the confusing less relevant numbers could be added farther down in the article.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
14:4814:48, 3 February 2023diffhist+5
Bretton Woods system
It existed for three decades. It didn't "persist" or "succeed", de facto has now "succeeded" longer than Breton woods was ever even functionalTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
1 February 2023
14:5314:53, 1 February 2023diffhist+49
Napoleon and the Jews
Clarified intent behind this law. If this is incorrect information please proceed to correct the page "Grand Sandherin" because that is where this information is pulled fromTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
14:2014:20, 1 February 2023diffhist−426
Infamous Decree
The source cited is obviously not reliable,if this citation IS RELIABLE then about 90% of the Grand Sandherin page needs to be rewritten to match this source.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
14:1614:16, 1 February 2023diffhist−228
Infamous Decree
We don't need to be stretching the truth of citations,on order to reinforce antisemitic stereotypes. Are you fucking Nazis?Tags: Revertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
14:0514:05, 1 February 2023diffhist+72
Napoleon and the Jews
Clarified that this is something Jewish people told Napoleon,not something Napoleon forced on them on any way shape or form.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
13:5713:57, 1 February 2023diffhist−520
Usury
→Judaism: Not sure how a single document,from one city, from 1799 is supposed to show that all Jewish people were ostracized across all of Europe since they year 1300 or so. anti-Semitism" is just a magic word that gets lies published to wikipedia apparently.Tags: Revertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
13:5213:52, 1 February 2023diffhist+168
Usury
→Judaism: Obviously this is very relevant. Does this article deliberately stop in the year 1500 or some such thing?Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
13:4513:45, 1 February 2023diffhist−3
Grand Sanhedrin
→Sessions: Obviously this decree/article has significant to Napoleon,and politicians,but just as clearly it was not for Jewish people,not followed by, not bonding for and not prescriptive for how Jewish people were bound by their religion.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:1515:15, 27 October 2021diffhist+28
Tomahawk
→Composition: Clarified that this is ALL just what ONE person claims. If it wasn't for Mike this entire article would have close to zero referencesTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:1315:13, 27 October 2021diffhist+22
Tomahawk
→Modern use: Whole US army units have ever used the tomahawk. Individuals may. Stop trying to glorify this simple tool for political reasons.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:1015:10, 27 October 2021diffhist−50
Tomahawk
→Composition: These smokable tomahawks exist commercially. So do bright neon ones. Is this article about history or fringe commercial products???Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:0715:07, 27 October 2021diffhist−182
Tomahawk
→Composition: If this was true there would not be several dozen pages in Wikipedia describing metelurgy before European contact. But there is.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:0415:04, 27 October 2021diffhist−15
Axe
→History: The author providing the reference does say they were independently invented. They provide absolutely NO arguments or evidence to support this. The only thing they have evidence for is the axes existing. Archaeology is fraught with bias, especially cultural.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit