09:5409:54, 16 August 2023diffhist+11
Barbie (film)
Let the sources speak for themselves. Metacritic says "generally positive reviews", not merely "positive", according to high audience scores and an overall enthusiastic reception also recorded by RT and current sources. Per WP:ONUS - wording implying otherwise have been contested. Talk page consensus should be sought before re-adding it
09:4109:41, 16 August 2023diffhist−43
Barbie (film)
It's fine without the
WP:WEASEL words, which falsely implies a "mixed reception" when Metacritic clearly records an overall positive consensus of reviews. The vague "assessment" by The NYtimes was an early (now outdated) sample of initial reviews now rendered moot by the high scores on MC and RT, contradicted by other clashing sources in the body itself. Per WP:ONUS - wording implying "a mixed reception" have been contested. Talk page consensus should be sought before re-adding it
03:1703:17, 24 July 2023diffhist+33
Barbenheimer
the other makes a good point, it's not important to mention the "critics" here, but all the sources agree at least that the film experience at least, to summarize, 'widespread acclaim' and is
WP:Notable to explain its influence as a cultural phenomenon
23:1223:12, 23 July 2023diffhist+2,103
Barbenheimer
Restore per
WP:RS We are not supposed to give
WP:Undue weight to aggregators like Metacritic as they are not considered reliable sources according to
MOS:FILMLEAD. Stop allowing this one disruptive editor from holding the page hostage! He’s
WP:NOTHERE to be reasonable
22:4922:49, 26 October 2022diffhist+23
Black genocide in the United States
Equalized the content between white and black genocide since you call one a conspiracy theory and not the other the white population dropped 11 percent in the united states according to the U.S census.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
09:5409:54, 16 August 2023diffhist+11
Barbie (film)
Let the sources speak for themselves. Metacritic says "generally positive reviews", not merely "positive", according to high audience scores and an overall enthusiastic reception also recorded by RT and current sources. Per WP:ONUS - wording implying otherwise have been contested. Talk page consensus should be sought before re-adding it
09:4109:41, 16 August 2023diffhist−43
Barbie (film)
It's fine without the
WP:WEASEL words, which falsely implies a "mixed reception" when Metacritic clearly records an overall positive consensus of reviews. The vague "assessment" by The NYtimes was an early (now outdated) sample of initial reviews now rendered moot by the high scores on MC and RT, contradicted by other clashing sources in the body itself. Per WP:ONUS - wording implying "a mixed reception" have been contested. Talk page consensus should be sought before re-adding it
03:1703:17, 24 July 2023diffhist+33
Barbenheimer
the other makes a good point, it's not important to mention the "critics" here, but all the sources agree at least that the film experience at least, to summarize, 'widespread acclaim' and is
WP:Notable to explain its influence as a cultural phenomenon
23:1223:12, 23 July 2023diffhist+2,103
Barbenheimer
Restore per
WP:RS We are not supposed to give
WP:Undue weight to aggregators like Metacritic as they are not considered reliable sources according to
MOS:FILMLEAD. Stop allowing this one disruptive editor from holding the page hostage! He’s
WP:NOTHERE to be reasonable
22:4922:49, 26 October 2022diffhist+23
Black genocide in the United States
Equalized the content between white and black genocide since you call one a conspiracy theory and not the other the white population dropped 11 percent in the united states according to the U.S census.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit