For 203.150.132.236 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

29 August 2019

28 August 2019

  • 23:33 23:33, 28 August 2019 diff hist +13 Indian National Army →‎Relations: I thought about this for a while. Up top, in the "Contents" box, it sort of looks like political or diplomatic "Relations", it doesn't quite explain what is going on in this section, in my opinion. "Relations" does, in a general sense cover it, "Relationships" seems too normal, civil society a term. So I settled upon "Relations in the field", to give a proper sense that this section describes the "interaction" between the two Parent or Host armies in the conflict and the INA.
  • 23:26 23:26, 28 August 2019 diff hist +76 Indian National Army →‎Japanese Army: Clearly a major change of topic between the early set-up in 1942-43, and conditions after a long and difficult field campaign in 1944. I felt that a paragraph break was in order. I threw in a links to the Army and to the Battle in case anyone was wondering about it!
  • 22:35 22:35, 28 August 2019 diff hist +6 Indian National Army →‎Japanese Army: The 'dash' was misplaced, so I moved it and took out the comma. Also, I think it adds clarity by using "out of" instead of simply "of", which is not 'forceful' enough to convey the proper meaning.
  • 22:21 22:21, 28 August 2019 diff hist +20 Indian independence movement →‎Christmas Island Mutiny and Royal Indian Navy Revolt: As I read this section, I expected both incidents to deal with WWII, and the "triangle" of conflict between Japan, Britain and Indian defectors. Instead, I was surprised to note in paragraph (2) that the "Mutiny" was POST WWII. These are from very different times and circumstances, so much so that each has its own WIKI page!! So I made it into two sections.
For 203.150.132.236 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

29 August 2019

28 August 2019

  • 23:33 23:33, 28 August 2019 diff hist +13 Indian National Army →‎Relations: I thought about this for a while. Up top, in the "Contents" box, it sort of looks like political or diplomatic "Relations", it doesn't quite explain what is going on in this section, in my opinion. "Relations" does, in a general sense cover it, "Relationships" seems too normal, civil society a term. So I settled upon "Relations in the field", to give a proper sense that this section describes the "interaction" between the two Parent or Host armies in the conflict and the INA.
  • 23:26 23:26, 28 August 2019 diff hist +76 Indian National Army →‎Japanese Army: Clearly a major change of topic between the early set-up in 1942-43, and conditions after a long and difficult field campaign in 1944. I felt that a paragraph break was in order. I threw in a links to the Army and to the Battle in case anyone was wondering about it!
  • 22:35 22:35, 28 August 2019 diff hist +6 Indian National Army →‎Japanese Army: The 'dash' was misplaced, so I moved it and took out the comma. Also, I think it adds clarity by using "out of" instead of simply "of", which is not 'forceful' enough to convey the proper meaning.
  • 22:21 22:21, 28 August 2019 diff hist +20 Indian independence movement →‎Christmas Island Mutiny and Royal Indian Navy Revolt: As I read this section, I expected both incidents to deal with WWII, and the "triangle" of conflict between Japan, Britain and Indian defectors. Instead, I was surprised to note in paragraph (2) that the "Mutiny" was POST WWII. These are from very different times and circumstances, so much so that each has its own WIKI page!! So I made it into two sections.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook