07:3107:31, 29 August 2019diffhist+10
Jagdkommando
→Equipment: According to the WIKI page on the SSG 08, it is used by this military unit. I should point out that all four of these (69, 04, 08, M1) are sniper rifles, each is more modern than the next. The number is the year they were introduced into service. I doubt that they use all four of these anymore?
06:3806:38, 29 August 2019diffhist+57
Austrian Armed Forces
→Vehicles: Cleaned up three dead links. The first one, the MAN 38.440 8x8 - if you do an internet search, you will find several listed, and they put a TGM in front of it; thus it is yet another one of the "TG-series" of trucks. So I added "TGM" for clarity.
05:5405:54, 29 August 2019diffhist+105
Polish Land Forces
→Equipment: Cleaned up two dead links. You will find that the Bergepanzer 2 is actually a Leopard 1, modified. Also, added "South Korea" to the AHS Krab listing, since the entire chassis, thus half the vehicle, is a licensed copy of a S. Korean vehicle.
23:3323:33, 28 August 2019diffhist+13
Indian National Army
→Relations: I thought about this for a while. Up top, in the "Contents" box, it sort of looks like political or diplomatic "Relations", it doesn't quite explain what is going on in this section, in my opinion. "Relations" does, in a general sense cover it, "Relationships" seems too normal, civil society a term. So I settled upon "Relations in the field", to give a proper sense that this section describes the "interaction" between the two Parent or Host armies in the conflict and the INA.
23:2623:26, 28 August 2019diffhist+76
Indian National Army
→Japanese Army: Clearly a major change of topic between the early set-up in 1942-43, and conditions after a long and difficult field campaign in 1944. I felt that a paragraph break was in order. I threw in a links to the Army and to the Battle in case anyone was wondering about it!
22:3522:35, 28 August 2019diffhist+6
Indian National Army
→Japanese Army: The 'dash' was misplaced, so I moved it and took out the comma. Also, I think it adds clarity by using "out of" instead of simply "of", which is not 'forceful' enough to convey the proper meaning.
22:2122:21, 28 August 2019diffhist+20
Indian independence movement
→Christmas Island Mutiny and Royal Indian Navy Revolt: As I read this section, I expected both incidents to deal with WWII, and the "triangle" of conflict between Japan, Britain and Indian defectors. Instead, I was surprised to note in paragraph (2) that the "Mutiny" was POST WWII. These are from very different times and circumstances, so much so that each has its own WIKI page!! So I made it into two sections.
07:3107:31, 29 August 2019diffhist+10
Jagdkommando
→Equipment: According to the WIKI page on the SSG 08, it is used by this military unit. I should point out that all four of these (69, 04, 08, M1) are sniper rifles, each is more modern than the next. The number is the year they were introduced into service. I doubt that they use all four of these anymore?
06:3806:38, 29 August 2019diffhist+57
Austrian Armed Forces
→Vehicles: Cleaned up three dead links. The first one, the MAN 38.440 8x8 - if you do an internet search, you will find several listed, and they put a TGM in front of it; thus it is yet another one of the "TG-series" of trucks. So I added "TGM" for clarity.
05:5405:54, 29 August 2019diffhist+105
Polish Land Forces
→Equipment: Cleaned up two dead links. You will find that the Bergepanzer 2 is actually a Leopard 1, modified. Also, added "South Korea" to the AHS Krab listing, since the entire chassis, thus half the vehicle, is a licensed copy of a S. Korean vehicle.
23:3323:33, 28 August 2019diffhist+13
Indian National Army
→Relations: I thought about this for a while. Up top, in the "Contents" box, it sort of looks like political or diplomatic "Relations", it doesn't quite explain what is going on in this section, in my opinion. "Relations" does, in a general sense cover it, "Relationships" seems too normal, civil society a term. So I settled upon "Relations in the field", to give a proper sense that this section describes the "interaction" between the two Parent or Host armies in the conflict and the INA.
23:2623:26, 28 August 2019diffhist+76
Indian National Army
→Japanese Army: Clearly a major change of topic between the early set-up in 1942-43, and conditions after a long and difficult field campaign in 1944. I felt that a paragraph break was in order. I threw in a links to the Army and to the Battle in case anyone was wondering about it!
22:3522:35, 28 August 2019diffhist+6
Indian National Army
→Japanese Army: The 'dash' was misplaced, so I moved it and took out the comma. Also, I think it adds clarity by using "out of" instead of simply "of", which is not 'forceful' enough to convey the proper meaning.
22:2122:21, 28 August 2019diffhist+20
Indian independence movement
→Christmas Island Mutiny and Royal Indian Navy Revolt: As I read this section, I expected both incidents to deal with WWII, and the "triangle" of conflict between Japan, Britain and Indian defectors. Instead, I was surprised to note in paragraph (2) that the "Mutiny" was POST WWII. These are from very different times and circumstances, so much so that each has its own WIKI page!! So I made it into two sections.