For 203.117.10.66
talk
block log
logs
filter log
30 September 2011
- 03:59 03:59, 30 September 2011 diff hist +427 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 02:43 02:43, 30 September 2011 diff hist +70 ODB++ Note on database
- 02:31 02:31, 30 September 2011 diff hist +61 ODB++ correction and added ref. ODB++ and RS-274X have about the same age
- 00:43 00:43, 30 September 2011 diff hist +295 ODB++ Pointer to specification
- 00:26 00:26, 30 September 2011 diff hist +760 Talk:ODB++ About "Access to the ODB++ and ODB++(X) specifications seems to be quite restricted."
29 September 2011
- 01:13 01:13, 29 September 2011 diff hist +309 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 00:43 00:43, 29 September 2011 diff hist +473 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
28 September 2011
- 17:29 17:29, 28 September 2011 diff hist +984 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 16:40 16:40, 28 September 2011 diff hist −33 ODB++ Make statement about 274x factual
- 16:38 16:38, 28 September 2011 diff hist −4 ODB++ typo
- 16:37 16:37, 28 September 2011 diff hist −2,470 ODB++ Remove advocay again, add link to specification Tag: references removed
- 16:32 16:32, 28 September 2011 diff hist −2,736 ODB++ Remoce advocay. Wikipedia is not to be used for promotion Tag: references removed
- 16:25 16:25, 28 September 2011 diff hist +570 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 16:04 16:04, 28 September 2011 diff hist +230 ODB++ Add link to spec, remove ref with blatant advocay
- 15:54 15:54, 28 September 2011 diff hist −2,712 ODB++ Remove "advocacy" and publicity. Wikipedia is a encyclopedia, not a forum to promote causes, however worthy Tag: section blanking
27 September 2011
- 13:12 13:12, 27 September 2011 diff hist +93 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 00:26 00:26, 27 September 2011 diff hist +576 Talk:ODB++ One more attempt to enter in discussion with Woz2
26 September 2011
- 23:19 23:19, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,784 ODB++ Undid revision 452599506 by Woz2 Restore version without publicity Tag: references removed
- 23:18 23:18, 26 September 2011 diff hist +416 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 22:49 22:49, 26 September 2011 diff hist +139 Talk:ODB++ Spec?
- 22:39 22:39, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,784 ODB++ Still no reply to my arguments on the talks page. Removed publicity again. Wikipedia is not a commercial tool. Tag: references removed
- 18:07 18:07, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,739 ODB++ Undid revision 452555879 by Aranea Mortem ( talk) This wst ''not'' a minor edit. Restored neutral version. Tag: references removed
- 17:55 17:55, 26 September 2011 diff hist +397 User talk:Aranea Mortem →ODB++: new section
- 17:34 17:34, 26 September 2011 diff hist −266 Bayesian inference Shorter
- 17:11 17:11, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,739 ODB++ Undid revision 452535069 by Woz2 ( talk) Remove commercial publicity Tag: references removed
- 17:03 17:03, 26 September 2011 diff hist +572 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 14:40 14:40, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,739 ODB++ So called references in this section were blatant publicity for Mentor and/or Artwork Tag: references removed
- 14:05 14:05, 26 September 2011 diff hist +78 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 13:31 13:31, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,921 ODB++ Biased. Does not contribute to the article
- 13:29 13:29, 26 September 2011 diff hist +257 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 13:24 13:24, 26 September 2011 diff hist +583 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 12:44 12:44, 26 September 2011 diff hist +382 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 12:38 12:38, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,879 ODB++ Undid revision 452511165 by Woz2 ( talk) Biased. Sneak publicity. Lists only some EDA companies. Contributes nothing to understanding ODB++
- 11:25 11:25, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,880 ODB++ Wikipedia policy is to be neutral. See Wikipedia content criteria. You sneak in publicity for one or other company. And it does not contribute to understanding what ODB++ is.
- 10:34 10:34, 26 September 2011 diff hist +857 ODB++ Sorry, I removed a par by mistake. I hereby restore it
- 10:29 10:29, 26 September 2011 diff hist −2,739 ODB++ Citing some companies that support ODB++ violates neutrality. Furthermore, it does not contribute to understanding what ODB++ is Tag: section blanking
23 August 2010
- 16:36 16:36, 23 August 2010 diff hist −15 Lise Mayer No edit summary
 | This is the
contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
For 203.117.10.66
talk
block log
logs
filter log
30 September 2011
- 03:59 03:59, 30 September 2011 diff hist +427 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 02:43 02:43, 30 September 2011 diff hist +70 ODB++ Note on database
- 02:31 02:31, 30 September 2011 diff hist +61 ODB++ correction and added ref. ODB++ and RS-274X have about the same age
- 00:43 00:43, 30 September 2011 diff hist +295 ODB++ Pointer to specification
- 00:26 00:26, 30 September 2011 diff hist +760 Talk:ODB++ About "Access to the ODB++ and ODB++(X) specifications seems to be quite restricted."
29 September 2011
- 01:13 01:13, 29 September 2011 diff hist +309 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 00:43 00:43, 29 September 2011 diff hist +473 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
28 September 2011
- 17:29 17:29, 28 September 2011 diff hist +984 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 16:40 16:40, 28 September 2011 diff hist −33 ODB++ Make statement about 274x factual
- 16:38 16:38, 28 September 2011 diff hist −4 ODB++ typo
- 16:37 16:37, 28 September 2011 diff hist −2,470 ODB++ Remove advocay again, add link to specification Tag: references removed
- 16:32 16:32, 28 September 2011 diff hist −2,736 ODB++ Remoce advocay. Wikipedia is not to be used for promotion Tag: references removed
- 16:25 16:25, 28 September 2011 diff hist +570 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 16:04 16:04, 28 September 2011 diff hist +230 ODB++ Add link to spec, remove ref with blatant advocay
- 15:54 15:54, 28 September 2011 diff hist −2,712 ODB++ Remove "advocacy" and publicity. Wikipedia is a encyclopedia, not a forum to promote causes, however worthy Tag: section blanking
27 September 2011
- 13:12 13:12, 27 September 2011 diff hist +93 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 00:26 00:26, 27 September 2011 diff hist +576 Talk:ODB++ One more attempt to enter in discussion with Woz2
26 September 2011
- 23:19 23:19, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,784 ODB++ Undid revision 452599506 by Woz2 Restore version without publicity Tag: references removed
- 23:18 23:18, 26 September 2011 diff hist +416 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 22:49 22:49, 26 September 2011 diff hist +139 Talk:ODB++ Spec?
- 22:39 22:39, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,784 ODB++ Still no reply to my arguments on the talks page. Removed publicity again. Wikipedia is not a commercial tool. Tag: references removed
- 18:07 18:07, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,739 ODB++ Undid revision 452555879 by Aranea Mortem ( talk) This wst ''not'' a minor edit. Restored neutral version. Tag: references removed
- 17:55 17:55, 26 September 2011 diff hist +397 User talk:Aranea Mortem →ODB++: new section
- 17:34 17:34, 26 September 2011 diff hist −266 Bayesian inference Shorter
- 17:11 17:11, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,739 ODB++ Undid revision 452535069 by Woz2 ( talk) Remove commercial publicity Tag: references removed
- 17:03 17:03, 26 September 2011 diff hist +572 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 14:40 14:40, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,739 ODB++ So called references in this section were blatant publicity for Mentor and/or Artwork Tag: references removed
- 14:05 14:05, 26 September 2011 diff hist +78 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 13:31 13:31, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,921 ODB++ Biased. Does not contribute to the article
- 13:29 13:29, 26 September 2011 diff hist +257 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 13:24 13:24, 26 September 2011 diff hist +583 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 12:44 12:44, 26 September 2011 diff hist +382 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 12:38 12:38, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,879 ODB++ Undid revision 452511165 by Woz2 ( talk) Biased. Sneak publicity. Lists only some EDA companies. Contributes nothing to understanding ODB++
- 11:25 11:25, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,880 ODB++ Wikipedia policy is to be neutral. See Wikipedia content criteria. You sneak in publicity for one or other company. And it does not contribute to understanding what ODB++ is.
- 10:34 10:34, 26 September 2011 diff hist +857 ODB++ Sorry, I removed a par by mistake. I hereby restore it
- 10:29 10:29, 26 September 2011 diff hist −2,739 ODB++ Citing some companies that support ODB++ violates neutrality. Furthermore, it does not contribute to understanding what ODB++ is Tag: section blanking
23 August 2010
- 16:36 16:36, 23 August 2010 diff hist −15 Lise Mayer No edit summary
|
| This is the
contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |