01:4801:48, 16 June 2021diffhist−26
Ideological bias on Wikipedia
Again, ZERO scientists mentioned in ANY of the articles. NOT ONE If there is one, please name them in the talk page. Not trying to be disruptive, literally just trying to make the page factual. Thanks.Tag: Reverted
04:4804:48, 15 June 2021diffhist−7
Ideological bias on Wikipedia
Undid revision 1028632050 by
Soibangla (
talk) Please justify why you have undone my previous edit with no reason provided. My initial reasons were clear and justified. Talk page section added. Feel free to add your thoughts there.Tags: UndoReverted
13:2613:26, 14 June 2021diffhist+28
Horseshoe theory
Undid revision 1028409955 by
Beyond My Ken (
talk) It is clearly relevant in a article about a political theory and he discloses the fact openly under disclosure statement in the article itself and the article is opinion news piece.Tags: UndoReverted
01:4801:48, 16 June 2021diffhist−26
Ideological bias on Wikipedia
Again, ZERO scientists mentioned in ANY of the articles. NOT ONE If there is one, please name them in the talk page. Not trying to be disruptive, literally just trying to make the page factual. Thanks.Tag: Reverted
04:4804:48, 15 June 2021diffhist−7
Ideological bias on Wikipedia
Undid revision 1028632050 by
Soibangla (
talk) Please justify why you have undone my previous edit with no reason provided. My initial reasons were clear and justified. Talk page section added. Feel free to add your thoughts there.Tags: UndoReverted
13:2613:26, 14 June 2021diffhist+28
Horseshoe theory
Undid revision 1028409955 by
Beyond My Ken (
talk) It is clearly relevant in a article about a political theory and he discloses the fact openly under disclosure statement in the article itself and the article is opinion news piece.Tags: UndoReverted