21:5821:58, 11 November 2013diffhist+6
Oregon v. Mitchell
Nobody had disputed that states could set age limits; the groundbreaking part of this ruling is that the Court functionally amended the Constitution by giving Congress the right to legislate on voting issues
21:4921:49, 11 November 2013diffhist−12
Mergini
That sounds like it's an ongoing process ("it might happen next month"), not something that's guaranteed to happen for the ordinary speciment
21:5821:58, 11 November 2013diffhist+6
Oregon v. Mitchell
Nobody had disputed that states could set age limits; the groundbreaking part of this ruling is that the Court functionally amended the Constitution by giving Congress the right to legislate on voting issues
21:4921:49, 11 November 2013diffhist−12
Mergini
That sounds like it's an ongoing process ("it might happen next month"), not something that's guaranteed to happen for the ordinary speciment